Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Rev E. 2019 Mar;99(3-1):032414. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.032414

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3.

Comparison of Monte Carlo simulations of the triad model (points) with various analytical expressions of Ceff (lines) for A = 50 nm, C = 100 nm and (a) G = 0, (b) G = 20 nm] and (c) G = 40 nm. The data are plotted as a function of kBT/fA and correspond to f ≥ 0.25 pN. The numerical results are in excellent agreement with the analytical expressions, both in the perturbative and nonperturbative regimes (see text). Error bars of Monte Carlo data are smaller than symbol sizes.