Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Divorce Remarriage. 2018 Aug 2;60(3):194–210. doi: 10.1080/10502556.2018.1488120

Table 4:

Stepwise Regression of Romantic Avoidance on Covariates, Father Support, Mother-Adolescent Relationship Quality, and the Mother-Adolescent Relationship Quality × Father Support Interaction Term.

Measure Step 1 B(SE B) Step 2 B(SE B) Step 3 B(SE B) Step 4 B(SE B)
EA Race −.96** (.35) −.99** (.34) −.98** (.34) −.98** (.34)
EA Romantic
Relationship Status		 1.11** (.27) 1.1** (.27) 1.09** (.27) 1.09** (.27)
Father Support −.22 (.14) −.19 (.15) −.18 (.15)
Mother-Adolescent Relationship Quality −.01 (.01) −.01 (.01)
Mother-Adolescent Relationship Quality × Father Support .01 (.01)
R2= .33** R2= .36**
Δ R2=.03		 R2=.36**
Δ R2=0		 R2= .37**
Δ R2=.01
**

p < .01

*

p < .05

†

p < .10

Note. Δ R2 = R2 change. Race is coded as Non-Hispanic White = 1, other = 0. Relationship status is coded 0= EA does not have a romantic partner and 1= EA has a romantic partner.

Note. When step 2 assessed EA race, EA relationship status, and Mother-Adolescent Relationship Quality B(SE B) for Mother-Adolescent Relationship Quality was −.01(.01) and was not statistically significant