Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 12;39(24):4684–4693. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3442-17.2019

Table 2.

Neurophysiological properties of C4- and C8-projecting corticospinal populationsa

C4-projecting
C8-projecting
Untrained (n > 60) Trained (n > 40) Untrained (n > 45) Trained (n > 55)
Resting Vm (mV) −67.4 ± 2.3 −67.6 ± 2.1 p = 0.62 −67.2 ± 1.8 −67.2 ± 2.2 p = 0.92
Holding pA at −65mV Vm −12.3 ± 43 −18.5 ± 52 p = 0.57 −27.9 ± 63 −16.5 ± 37 p = 0.38
Rin (mΩ) 79.6 ± 20 77 ± 24 p = 0.44 72 ± 13.5 76.4 ± 20 p = 0.31
Spike threshold (mV) −42.8 ± 4 −44.3 ± 4.2 p = 0.09 −42.4 ± 5 −42.9 ± 4.6 p = 0.66
Rheobase (pA) 141 ± 72 146 ± 56 p = 0.7 160 ± 77 131 ± 68 p = 0.062
Spike half-width (ms) 2.32 ± 0.4 2.38 ± 0.4 p = 0.57 2.26 ± 0.4 2.36 ± 0.4 p = 0.26
Spike height from threshold (mV) 79 ± 6.7 79.2 ± 5.9 p = 0.62 78.5 ± 9.1 78.1 ± 7.3 p = 0.73

aData are mean ± SD. p values reflect comparisons of trained versus untrained conditions within each cell-pair group. For spike threshold, rheobase, spike half-width, and spike height, the membrane holding potential was normalized at −65 mV across cells via current injection.