Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Heart Fail Rev. 2019 Jul;24(4):601–615. doi: 10.1007/s10741-019-09769-2

Table 2.

Comparisons of in vitro models

Neonatal cardiomyocytes Adult cardiomoycytes Cardiac cell lines ESC/iPSCs
Pros
  • Easy primary isolation

  • Able to culture for a long period

  • Well-established checmical drugs to induce pathologic conditions

  • High transfection efficiency

  • High similarity to human cells in the morphology and behavior

  • Able to obtain cells from diseased heart

  • Able to assess contractility and Ca2+ transient

  • Easy to culture

  • Able to culture for a long period

  • Able to passage and recover from a frozen stock

  • High transfection efficiency

  • Minimize animal sacrifices

  • Derived from human source

  • Able to assess Ca2+ transient

  • Able to study human genetic disorder

Cons
  • Immaturity

  • Non-uniform contraction

  • Limited gene manupulation methods

  • Technically difficult to isolate cells

  • Lack of cardiac phenotype

  • Unable to assess contractility

  • Technically difficult

  • High cost

  • Immaturity

  • Batch-to-batch variation

Application
  • Hypertrophy assessment

  • High-throughput drug screen

  • Contractility measurement

  • Ca2+ imaging

  • Patch-clamp

  • Sublocalization study by immunostaining

  • High-throughput drug screen

  • Toxicology

  • High-throughput drug screen

  • Toxicology

  • Ca2+ imaging

  • Precision medicine