Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 24;46(6):2760–2775. doi: 10.1002/mp.13526

Table 4.

Statistical modeling and machine learning: features, models, and prediction outcomes

Articles Input features Modeling methods Prediction outcomes
Zhu et al.7, 9, 10, 13, 17, 20, 82 Volume features: PTV‐OAR overlap volume etc.
Distance features: first three PCA components of Distance‐to‐Target Histogram
Support vector regression
Multivariate stepwise regression
Model/regression tree
The first three PCA components of DVH
Appenzoler et al.8 OAR distance‐to‐PTV Sub‐DVH as basis functions of an OAR volume function of overlap subvolumes
Function fitting using least squares minimization
DVH
Lee et al.69, 70 OVH values Logistic regression
Linear regression
K‐nearest neighbor
Weight for an OAR constraint (Rectum, Bladder)
Yang et al.48 Lx – distance from PTV that result in x% of overlap in OVH Linear regression Dx – dose received by x% of OAR volume
Fogliata et al. 11, 12, 15, 16, 18, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 75 Volume features: PTV‐OAR overlap volume etc.Distance features: PCA components of
Distance‐to‐target histogram
Other unpublished features
Multivariate regression (RapidPlan) DVH
Nwankwo et al.59, 60 Distance‐to‐PTV
Slice level
Mean‐dose‐at‐distance function
Mean dose standard deviation function
Slice weight function
Voxel dose
Amit et al.72 Beam‐independent features: tumor distribution, tumor height
Beam‐dependent features: tumor‐organ overlap, beam distance, tumor projection shape
Random forest regression Beam angle
Liu et al.58 3D OAR structures Active shape model
Active optical flow model
Voxel dose
Wang et al.19 First two PCA component scores of OVH of OARs
Z‐axis overlap index
Stepwise multiple regression Mean lung dose
Mean heart dose
(forming a Pareto Front)
Yuan et al.73 Beam number and angles K‐medoids clustering Standard beam bouquets
Cooper et al.50 Distance to the tangent field edge Logistic regression Left anterior descending artery maximum dose
Kuo et al.51 Contralateral/ipsilateral lung volumes
Ipsilateral normal/total lung volume
MILD
Linear regression Prescription dose
MILD
Prescription dose
Shiraishi et al.65 PTV volume
Number of fields
Azimuthal angle Elevation angle
Distance from PTV Distance from OARs
Artificial neural network (1 hidden layer with 10 nodes) Voxel dose
Valdes et al.76, 77 78 complexity metrics: faction of MU per dose, jaw position, etc. Poisson regression with Lasso regularization Passing rate
Campbell et al.66 Geometric features: distance‐to‐PTV, distance to OARs, etc.
Plan features: target volume, photon energy, etc.
Artificial Neural Network (1 hidden layer with 25 nodes) Voxel dose
Fan et al.30 Distance‐to‐PTV
Angle with respect to origin of coordinate (center of CT)
KDE DVH
Powis et al.52 Fractional OAR‐PTV volume overlap
Prescription dose
Curve fitting Mean rectum dose
Brown et al.78 Control point features
Beam features
Fraction group features
Plan features
Ensemble‐outlier filtering
Normalized cut sampling
SVM
Classification (acceptable vs unacceptable plans)
Millunchick et al.54 Fractional overlap of parotid with combined targets, and with 0.5 and 1.0 cm margins Stepwise regression Parotid mean dose

PCA, principal component analysis; PTV, planning target volume; OAR, organ at risk; OVH, overlap volume histogram; MILD, mean ipsilateral lung dose; KDE, Kernel density estimate.