Table 1:
Technique | Example technologies |
Scale of analysis | Method | Detection limit (% of Cost cfDNA) |
Assay personalization |
Advantages | Limitations | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS-PCR | ARMS [112] | Single-locus or multiplexed assays | Preferentially amplifies rare mutant DNA molecules | ~ 0.1–1 | $ | Some required | Ease of use; ideal for detecting recurrent ‘hotspot’ point mutations | Can only query small number of variants
concurrently; cannot detect mutations not known a priori |
dPCR | dPCR [117] ddPCR [119,125,126,127] BEAMing [128, 129] |
Single-locus or multiplexed assays | Partitions target DNA into different reactions for massively parallel qPCR |
~0.01 | $$ | Some required | High sensitivity | Can only query small number of variants
concurrently; cannot detect mutations not known a priori |
WGS | WGS [143, 144] Plasma-Seq [139, 140] PARE [145] |
Genome-wide | NGS of whole genome |
~10 | $$– $$$ | Not required | Entire genome is interrogated | Low sensitivity; mostly limited to SCNA detection |
FAST-SeqS [141] | ||||||||
Retrotransposon-based amplicon NGS | mFAST-SeqS [152] WALDO [142] |
Genome-wide retrotransposon sites | PCR amplification of retrotransposon insertion sites prior to NGS analysis | ~ 5 | $$ | Not required | Rapid aneuploidy assessment with lower cost
than WGS |
Limited to aneuploidy detection |
WES | WES [79] | Exome-wide | NGS of whole exome | ~ 5 | $$$ | Not required | Entire exome is interrogated | Low sensitivity |
Multiplex PCR-based NGS | TAm-Seq [155] Enhanced TAm-Seq [156] Safe-SeqS [111] Natera® [64] |
Targeted sequencing | PCR amplification enriches targets prior to NGS analysis | ~ 0.01–2.0 | $$ | Some required | High sensitivity (modern methods) | Less comprehensive than other NGS
methods; unable to detect SCNAs; unable to detect fusions without assay personalization |
Hybrid Capture-based NGS | CAPP-Seq [70,84] TEC-Seq [73] Guardant360® [161, 162] FoundationOne® Liquid [163] |
Targeted sequencing | Subset of exome is hybridized to biotinylated probes and captured for NGS analysis | ~ 0.001–0.5 | $$ | Not required | High sensitivity; detects multiple mutation types; broadly applicable without personalization |
Less comprehensive than WGS or WES |
Combination approaches | CAPP-Seq + GRP [149] CancerSEEK [169] UroSEEK [7] |
Single-locus to genome-wide | Combines different ctDNA detection methods, sometimes including protein biomarkers | Variable | $$–$$$ | Variable | Improved detection compared to standard ctDNA analysis alone in certain settings | Potentially more time and resource intensive |
ARMS Amplification Refractory Mutation System, AS-PCR allele-specific PCR, BEAMing beads, emulsion, amplification and magnetics, CAPP-Seq Cancer Personalized Profiling by Deep Sequencing, cfDNA cell-free DNA, ctDNA circulating tumor DNA, ddPCR digital droplet PCR, dPCR digital PCR, FAST-SeqS Fast Aneuploidy Screening Test-Sequencing System, GRP Genome Representation Profiling, mFAST-SeqS modified FAST-SeqS, NGS next-generation sequencing, PARE Personalized Analysis of Rearranged Ends, Plasma-Seq plasma sequencing, Safe-SeqS Safe Sequencing System, SCNA somatic copy number alternation, TAm-Seq Tagged-Amplicon Sequencing, TEC-Seq Targeted Error Correction Sequencing, WALDO Within Sample Aneuploidy Detection, WES whole exome sequencing, WGS whole genome sequencing