Table 2.
Characterization of TDP–TTX conjugates
| Conjugate | Feed dicarboxylic acid (mmol) | Feed triol (mmol) | Feed PEG (mmol) | Feed TTX (mmol) | TTX loadinga (µg mg−1) | Proportion of bound TTXb (wt%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TgD8P2000–TTX | 5 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 0.003 | 0.16 | 99.2 |
| TgD8P1000–TTX | 5 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 0.003 | 0.28 | 99.0 |
| TgD8P200–TTX | 10 | 2.5 | 5 | 0.003 | 0.31 | 99.5 |
| TgD8–TTX | 10 | 5.8 | – | 0.003 | 0.40 | 99.4 |
| TgD8–TTXHc | 10 | 5.8 | – | 0.012 | 1.60 | 99.4 |
| TgD5–TTX | 10 | 5.8 | – | 0.003 | 0.54 | 99.5 |
| TgD1–TTX | 10 | 5.8 | – | 0.003 | 0.64 | 99.4 |
| TcD8–TTX | 10 | 5.8 | – | 0.003 | 0.27 | 99.6 |
aAs determined by ELISA
bProportion of TTX conjugated with polymer as a fraction of the total TTX in the reaction
cTgD8–TTXH has four-fold higher TTX loading than TgD8–TTX