Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 5;10(2):185–193. doi: 10.1007/s13167-019-00166-1

Table 3.

Comparison of RDW between PACG and control subjects, stratified according to age and gender

PACG group Control group t value p value
Male 12.96 ± 0.84 12.65 ± 0.53 6.349 < 0.001
  < 50 12.63 ± 0.61 12.34 ± 0.52 2.250 0.027
 40–50 13.08 ± 1.07 12.67 ± 0.56 3.287 0.001
 50–60 12.96 ± 0.82 12.65 ± 0.50 4.002 < 0.001
  > 70 13.00 ± 0.68 12.75 ± 0.53 2.951 0.004
Female 13.02 ± 0.81 12.65 ± 0.52 10.452 < 0.001
  < 50 13.17 ± 1.08 12.62 ± 0.55 3.640 < 0.001
 40–50 12.96 ± 0.88 12.56 ± 0.56 5.066 < 0.001
 50–60 12.94 ± 0.63 12.64 ± 0.50 6.015 < 0.001
  > 70 13.14 ± 0.83 12.75 ± 0.53 5.804 < 0.001

Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). The independent Student’s t test was used

PACG primary angle-closure glaucoma, RDW red blood cell distribution width