Table 3.
Sex | Positive RT‐QuIC | Negative RT‐QuIC | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | F | M | M | M | M | F | M | M | F | M | M | F | F | M | M | |
Age | 64 | 47 | 52 | 40 | 64 | 38 | 61 | 27 | 71 | 60 | 28 | 37 | 43 | 51 | 68 | 72 |
Cognitive impairmenta | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Depressiona | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bladder symptomsa | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Constipationa | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
RBDb | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No |
Hyposmiac | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No |
Abnormal DaT‐SPECT | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
Meets criteria for prodromal PDd | Yes | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | Yes | No | No | No | No | No | No | No |
LR for probable prodromal PD PD† | 947.6 | 2.9 | 1076.8 | 127.3 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 1.3 | 29.5 | 289.3 | 16.2 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 9.2 | 5.42 | 174.7 | 5.2 |
RBD, REM sleep behavior disorder; MDS, International Parkinson's disease and Movement Disorders Society; PD, Parkinson's disease; LR, likelihood ratio.
International Parkinson's disease and Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale part I scores: 0 = normal; 1 = slight, 2 = mild, 3 = moderate, 4 = severe (Goetz et al. 2008).
Based on the REM sleep behavior questionnaire (Stiasny‐Kolster et al. 2007).
Based on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Test normative values (Doty et al. 1995).
The subject meets the probability threshold of >80% for probable prodromal PD based on the MDS research criteria for prodromal PD (Berg et al. 2015, Mirelman et al. 2018).
Total likelihood ratio based on the MDS Research Criteria for prodromal PD (Berg et al. 2015, Mirelman et al. 2018). Missing values were not imputed (LR = 1).