Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ZooKeys logoLink to ZooKeys
. 2019 Jun 5;852:1–21. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.852.28964

Two new species of Acanthobothrium Blanchard, 1848 (Onchobothriidae) in Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 (Narcinidae) from Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico

Francisco Zaragoza-Tapia 1, Griselda Pulido-Flores 1, Juan Violante-González 2, Scott Monks 1,✉
PMCID: PMC6562051  PMID: 31210739

Abstract Abstract

Two species of Acanthobothrium (Onchoproteocephalidea: Onchobothriidae) are described from the spiral intestine of Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895, in Bahía de Acapulco, Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico. Based on the four criteria used for the identification of species of Acanthobothrium, A.soniaesp. nov. is a Category 2 species (less than 15 mm in total length with less than 50 proglottids, less than 80 testes, and with the ovary asymmetrical in shape). Acanthobothriumvidalisp. nov. is a Category 6 species (more than 15 mm in total length with more than 50 proglottids, fewer than 80 testes, and the ovary is asymmetrical). The new species differ from similar species from the Pacific Ocean by total length, the number of proglottids, diameter of the accessory sucker, the length of the cirrus sac, the number of testes per proglottid and the measurements of hooks. With the recognition of A.soniaesp. nov. and A.vidalisp. nov., 42 species of Acanthobothrium have been reported from the Pacific coast of the Americas. This is the first report of species of Acanthobothrium from a member of Narcine from Mexico and it brings the number of species reported from elasmobranchs from the Pacific Coast of Mexico to 13.

Keywords: Acanthobothrium , Elasmobranchii , Helminth, Narcine entemedor , Onchoproteocephalidea , Torpediniformes

Introduction

Acanthobothrium Blanchard, 1848 is one of the richest genera within Onchoproteocephalidea (Maleki et al. 2013; Caira et al. 2017), but relatively few occurrences have been documented in Mexico. To date, the best-studied locality is the Gulf of California (Sea of Cortez; Mar de Cortés, Golfo de California) with the descriptions of 10 species (Appy and Dailey 1973; Caira and Burge 2001; Caira and Zahner 2001; Ghoshroy and Caira 2001). The only other species known from the Pacific Coast of Mexico was described from the more southern state of Jalisco (Monks et al. 1996) (see Merlo-Serna and García-Prieto 2016). More recently, A.cartagenensis Brooks & Mayes, 1980 was reported from Quintana Roo, Mexico (Caribbean) (Monks et al. 2015a) and A.marquesi was described from Campeche, Mexico (Gulf of Mexico) by Rodríguez-Ibarra et al. (2018). As part of a collaborative project to extend the knowledge of the helminth fauna of marine fishes in Mexico, rays were collected from the coastal waters off Acapulco, Guerrero, a region with few studies of the parasites of rays. There are six reports of parasites of rays from Acapulco, none for Acanthobothrium (see Merlo-Serna and García-Prieto 2016). In this paper, two new species of Acanthobothrium are described from Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 (Elasmobranchii: Torpediniformes: Narcinidae); one Category 2 species (Ghoshroy and Caira 2001) and one Category 6 species. The new species constitute the first records from the Southern Pacific Coast of Mexico and the first record of species of Acanthobothrium reported in Narcineentemedor from Mexico.

Materials and methods

Eleven recently killed specimens of Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 (Giant electric ray or Cortez Numbfish) were purchased from local fishermen at Playa Las Hamacas, Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero (16°51'10.80"N, 99°53'59.02"W) in February, April, May, June 2011 and June 2012. Rays were transported to the laboratory (Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Unidad Académica de Ecología Marina) in ice chests containing ice where the spiral intestine was removed and opened by longitudinal incision. Collection, preservation and mounting follow Monks et al. (2015b). Stained specimens were examined using a compound photomicroscope (Leica DM-LB2) equipped with both normal light optics and differential interference contrast (DIC-Nomarski) optics. Figures were drawn with the aid of a drawing tube. Measurements are presented as ranges and number of specimens from which the measurements were taken is given in parentheses. Hook measurements follow Euzet (1959) as modified by Ghoshroy and Caira (2001). Measurements are in micrometers unless otherwise stated. Other hook terminology follows that of Caira (1985). Designation of proglottid apolysis follows Caira et al. (1999) and Franzese and Ivanov (2018). Microtriches on the scolex and peduncle were not examined using SEM, so they are referred to by the general name “microtriches” without qualifying them as proposed by Chervy (2009). The categorical method suggested by Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) and Fyler and Caira 2006 was used to facilitate comparisons among species of Acanthobothrium from the Eastern Pacific Ocean and other congeners with similar morphological characters described in the Pacific Ocean. Specimens from several museums were examined, the acronyms are as follows:

CNHE (Colección Nacional de Helmintos del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México);

HWML (University of Nebraska State Museum, Harold W. Manter Laboratory, Division of Parasitology, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA);

CHE (Colección de Helmintos, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, México).

Type material was deposited in CNHE (holotype and paratypes), HWML (paratypes), and CHE (paratypes). Application and validity of scientific names, authorities, and common names of fish are in accord with Froese and Pauly (2018) and Last et al. (2016).

Systematic accounts

Order Onchoproteocephalidea Caira, Jensen, Waeschenbach, Olson & Littlewood, 2014

Family Onchobothriidae Braun, 1900

Genus Acanthobothrium Blanchard, 1848
Type species Acanthobothriumcoronatum (Rudolphi, 1819) Blanchard, 1848
Acanthobothrium soniae sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/4E0635D5-3E38-4FEC-8192-4B0AEF53C76C

Figures 1A–E ; 2A–D

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Open in a new tab

Holotype of Acanthobothriumsoniae sp. nov. (CNHE-11136). A Scolex B hooks C mature proglottid D terminal proglottid E genitalia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A, D); 100 µm (B, E); 150 µm (C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Open in a new tab

Light microscope photographs of holotype of Acanthobothriumsoniae sp. nov. (CNHE-11136). A Scolex B details of bothridium C peduncle cephalic D genitalia. Scale bars: 200 µm (A); 40 µm (B), 100 µm (C, D). Abbreviations: mt microtriches; vg vagina; cs cirrus sac; gp genital pore.

Type material.

Holotype (CNHE-11136), 3 paratypes (CNHE-11137), 3 paratypes (HWML-139978), and 1 paratype (CHE-P00081).

Other material examined.

Acanthobothriumbullardi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 (CNHE–4046, México) paratype; A.campbelli Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 (CNHE–3033, Costa Rica; HWML–38546, Costa Rica) voucher and paratype; A.costarricense Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 (CNHE–3034, Costa Rica) 2 vouchers; A.dasi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 (CNHE–4044, México; HWML–15549, 15550, 15551, México) 4 paratypes; A.franus Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 (CNHE–3140, Costa Rica) paratype; A.inbiorium Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 (CNHE–3138, Costa Rica) paratype; A.puntarenasense Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 (CNHE–4176, Costa Rica) paratype; A.rajivi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 (CNHE–4039, México) paratype; A.vargasi Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 (HWML 38545, Costa Rica).

Type host.

Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 (Elasmobranchii: Torpediniformes: Narcinidae).

Type locality.

Bahía de Acapulco (Playa Las Hamacas: 16°51'11"N, 99°53'59"W), Guerrero, México.

Site of infection.

Spiral intestine.

Quantitative descriptors of parasite populations (Bush et al. 1997).

Prevalence= 9.0% (1 ray of 11 was infected); abundance = 0.73 (8 helminths in 11 rays); mean intensity = 8 (8 helminths in 1 infected ray).

Etymology.

The species is named in remembrance of Sonia Virginia Flores León, former player of the Pumas Club Women’s Basketball Team, UNAM, daughter of Virginia León-Règagnon and Martín Ignacio Flores-Carbajal and dear friend of SM and GP-F; she will not be forgotten.

Diagnosis.

Acanthobothriumsoniae sp. nov. is a Category 2 species. It is small, with a range of 10–13 acraspedote proglottids. The testes are wider than long with a range of 31–47 testes per proglottid. The arms of the ovary are unequal (asymmetrical). Finally, this species also can be distinguished from similar congeners by total length, number of proglottids, diameter of accessory sucker, the length of the cirrus sac, number of testes per proglottid, and size of the hooks.

Description.

[Based on 5 complete worms and 3 partial specimens] Worms 2.9–6.7 mm (n = 5) long, euapolytic; 10–13 (n = 5) proglottids per worm. Scolex 380–420 (n = 6) long by 280–320 (n = 6) wide, with four bothridia. Maximum width of scolex at level of middle loculus (Figs 1A, 2A). Bothridia free posteriorly, tri-locular, 340–380 (n = 6) long by 140–160 (n = 6) wide, with anterior muscular pad (Figs 1A, 2A). Muscular pad 105–130 (n = 6) wide, with apical sucker 45–50 (n = 6) and one pair of bipronged hooks at posterior margin (Figs 1A, 2A). Anterior loculus of bothridia 175–205 (n = 6) long; middle loculus 60–90 (n = 6) long; posterior loculus 80–95 (n = 6) long (Figs 1A, 2A); loculus length ratio (anterior:middle:posterior) 1:0.38:0.46. Velum between medial margins of bothridia in dorsal or ventral pairs not seen (Figs 1A, 2A). Hooks bipronged, hollow, with tubercle on proximal surface of axial prong; internal channels of axial and abaxial prongs continuous, smooth, the base and anterior part of each hook embedded in musculature of scolex, tips of prongs free (Figs 1A, B, 2A). Bases (handles) of medial and lateral hooks articulate to one another (Figs 1B, 2A). Lateral hook measurements (n = 6): A 43–45, B 88–105, C 83–93, D 125–138; Medial hook measurements (n = 6): A’ 38–45, B’ 83–108, C’ 80–98, D’ 125–143. Cephalic peduncle 450–630 (n = 6) long by 70–95 (n = 6) wide, not all the cephalic peduncle is covered with prominent microtriches (Figs 1A, 2C). Scolex is covered with microtriches (Fig. 2B). Proglottids acraspedote. Immature proglottids 55–110 (n = 8) long by 60–115 (n = 8) wide, mature proglottids 225–800 (n = 8) long by 125–215 (n = 8) wide (Fig. 1C), terminal proglottids 585–1,425 (n = 7) long by 160–275 (n = 7) wide (Fig. 1D). Genital pore marginal, irregularly alternating, 56%–68% (n = 7) from anterior end of proglottid; genital atrium present (Fig. 1E). Testes in single layer, arranged in two irregular columns, one on each side of the uterus (Fig. 1C, D). Testes generally wider than long in mature proglottids, 25–63 (n = 8) long by 13–28 (n = 8) wide (Fig. 1C). Total number of testes 31–47 (n = 8), aporal 16–26 (n = 8), poral 15–21 (n = 8), preporal 11–17 (n = 8), and postporal 3–5 (n = 8); all testes located anterior to ovarian isthmus. Cirrus sac pyriform, extending anteriorly (Figs 1C, D, E, 2D), 55–90 (n = 6) long by 63–96 (n = 6) wide in mature proglottids, 85–140 (n = 6) long by 48–90 (n = 6) wide in termial proglottids. Cirrus armed.

Vagina extending laterally from common genital atrium, following anterior margin of cirrus sac, weakly sinuous posteriorly along medial line of proglottid to oötype (Figs 1C, D, E, 2D); vaginal sphincter absent. Seminal receptacle not seen. Ovary inverted A-shaped in frontal view in mature and terminal proglottids (Fig. 1C, D). Arms of ovary unequal (Fig. 1C, D); aporal arm always longer than poral arm. Aporal arm 78–275 (n = 7) long in mature proglottids, 243–625 (n = 7) long in terminal proglottids; poral arm 68–213 (n = 7) long in mature proglottids, 190–550 (n = 7) long in terminal proglottids and Mehlis’ gland posterior to ovarian isthmus. Vitellarium follicular form lateral bands, extending from near anterior margin of proglottid to near posterior margin of proglottid (Fig. 1C, D); follicles 15–23 (n = 6) long by 10–13 (n = 6). Uterus thick-walled, saccate, extending from anterior margin of proglottid to near posterior margin of proglottid. Excretory ducts laterally. Gravid proglottids and eggs not seen.

Remarks.

There are 42 Category 2 species (sensu Ghoshroy and Caira 2001) of Acanthobothrium that have been described worldwide. Of these, 17 species have been found in the Pacific Ocean, 14 of which are amphi-American (Table 1).

Table 1.

Comparison of Acanthobothriumsoniae sp. nov. vs. Category 2 species of the genus from the Pacific Ocean. Abbreviations: No. Number; A Base (handle) length; B Axial prong length; C Abaxial prong length; D Total hook length. Note: the use of “–” without numerical values are measurement ranges that overlap those of A.soniae sp. nov.

Species of Acanthobothrium Total length (mm) No. of proglottids Diameter of accesory sucker (μm) Length of cirrus sac (μm) No. of testes per proglottid Measurements of hook (μm)
A B C D
Pacific coast of the Americas
A.soniae sp. nov. 2.9–6.7 10–13 45–50 55–90 31–47 43–45 88–105 83–93 125–138
A.annapinkiensis Carvajal & Goldstein, 1971 – 15–26 ~ 120 – – 60–80 180–250 160–240 240–310
A.brachyacanthum Riser, 1955 – – – 123–135 – – 66 57–60 90
A.bullardi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 – – – 113–175 – – – 43–78 –
A.campbelli Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 0.99–1.8 3–6 16–38 – 15–23 16–41 – – 95–120
A.cimari Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 – 14–33 – 148–180 – – – 57–82 –
A.coquimbensis Carvajal & Jeges, 1980 – – 16–44 200–400 – – – 96–136 –
A.costarricense Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 – – – 110–236 – – – 54–66 –
A.dasi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 – – – 100–153 – – – 50–75 68–125
A.olseni Dailey & Mudry, 1968 – – 24–34 96–168 – – – – 91–115
A.puntarenasense Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 – 23–27 14–15 151–183 – – 72–82 75–81 107–114
A.rajivi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 – – – – 9–13 28–35 63–73 58–68 88–98
A.unilateralis Alexander, 1953 – – – 150–160 – 58–64 118 118 173–182
A.vargasi Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 – 5–7 22–41 – 22–29 – – – –
Other parts of the Pacific Ocean
A.guanghaiense Yang, Sun, Zhi, Iwaki, Reyda & Yang, 2016 – 13–28 28–32 95–132 – – – 94–124 –
A.masnihae Fyler & Caira, 2006 – 23–43 – – 6–12 – 69–88 – 99–123
A.popi Fyler, Caira & Jensen, 2009 – 14–20 50–88 108–152 – – – – –
A.tetabuanense Reyda & Caira, 2006 – 25–36 – – 6–12 – – – –
Open in a new tab

Acanthobothriumsoniae sp. nov. is a Category 2 species (sensu Ghoshroy and Caira 2001): Category 2 species have a total length ≤ 15 mm (the length of A.soniae sp. nov. is 2.9–6.7 mm), a strobila made up of ≤ 50 proglottids (A.soniae sp. nov. has 10–13 proglottids), the number of testes per proglottids ≤ 80 (A.soniae sp. nov. has 31–47 testes per proglottid), and the arms of the ovary are asymmetrical.

As presented in Table 1, the new species can be distinguished from similar Category 2 species of Acanthobothrium that have been described from the Pacific Coast of the Americas (amphi-American species), and from others parts of Pacific Ocean by the measurements given in the Table 1. The total length of the new species (2.9–6.7 mm) is shorter than that of A.campbelli (0.99–1.8 mm). The number of proglottids of the new species (10–13) is less than that of A.annapinkiensis Carvajal & Goldstein, 1971 (15–26), A.cimari Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 (14–33), A.puntarenasense (23–27), A.guanghaiense Yang, Sun, Zhi, Iwaki, Reyda & Yang, 2016 (13–28), A.masnihae Fyler & Caira, 2006 (23–43), A.popi Fyler, Caira & Jensen, 2009 (14–20), and A.tetabuanense Reyda & Caira, 2006 (25–36), and the number of proglottids of the new species is greater than that of A.campbelli (3–6) and A.vargasi (5–7). The diameter of the accessory sucker of the new species (45–50) is shorter than that A.annapinkiensis (~120) and A.popi (50–88), and the diameter of the accessory sucker of the new species is longer that A.campbelli (16–38), A.coquimbensis Carvajal & Jeges, 1980 (16–44), A.olseni Dailey & Mudry, 1968 (24–34), A.puntarenasense (14–15), A.vargasi (22–41), A.guanghaiense (28–32) and A.popi (50–88). The length of the cirrus sac of the new species (55–90) is shorter than that of A.brachyacanthum Risen, 1955 (123–135), A.bullardi (113–175), A.cimari (148–180), A.coquimbensis (200–400), A.costarricense (100–236), A.dasi (100–153), A.olseni (96–168), A.puntarenasense (151–183), A.unilateralis Alexander, 1953 (150–160), A.guanghaiense (95–132), and A.popi (108–152). The number of testes per proglottid of the new species (31–47) is less than that of A.campbelli (15–23), A.rajivi (9–13), A.vargasi (6–12), and A.tetabuanense (6–12). Finally the measurements of the hooks of the 18 species can be found in Table 1.

Acanthobothrium vidali sp. nov.

http://zoobank.org/9D9106EF-7772-4E61-A44F-B2D151782329

Figures 3A–D ; 4A–D

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Open in a new tab

Holotype of Acanthobothriumvidali sp. nov. (CNHE-11134). A Scolex B hooks C mature proglottid D genitalia. Scale bars: 400 µm (A); 200 µm (B–D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Open in a new tab

Light microscope photographs of holotype of Acanthobothriumvidali sp. nov. (CNHE-11134). A Scolex B details of bothridium C peduncle cephalic D genitalia. Scale bars: 400 µm (A); 40 µm (B);100 µm (C, D). Abbreviations: vg vagina; cs cirrus sac; gp genital pore.

Type material.

Holotype (CNHE-11134), 7 paratypes (CNHE-11135), 3 paratypes (HWML-139979, 139980, 139981), and 7 paratypes (CHE-P00082).

Other material examined.

Acanthobothriumfranus Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 (CNHE–3140, Costa Rica) paratype; A.inbiorium Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 (CNHE–3138, Costa Rica) paratype; A.obuncus Marques, Brooks & Barriga, 1997 (CNHE–3032A, 3167B, Ecuador) holotype; A.soberoni Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 (CNHE–4042, México).

Type host.

Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 (Elasmobranchii: Torpediniformes: Narcinidae).

Type locality.

Bahía de Acapulco (Playa Las Hamacas: 16°51'11"N, 99°53'59"W), Guerrero, México.

Site of infection.

Spiral intestine.

Quantitative descriptors of parasite populations (Bush et al. 1997).

Prevalence = 36.36% (4 of 11 rays were infected); abundance = 1.91 (21 helminths in 11 rays); mean intensity = 5.25 (21 helminths in 4 infected rays).

Etymology.

The species is named in honor of Dr Victor Vidal Martínez (Departamento de Recursos del Mar, CINVESTAV-IPN, Merida, Yucatan, Mexico), for his contribution to our knowledge of helminths of fishes from Mexico.

Diagnosis.

Acanthobothriumvidali sp. nov. is a Category 6 species. This species is large, with a range of 164–214 craspedote proglottids, with a range of 50–76 testes per proglottid, and the arms of ovary unequal in length (asymmetrical). This new species also can be distinguished from similar congeners by total length, number of proglottids, diameter of accessory sucker, the length of the cirrus sac, number of testes per proglottid, and size of the hooks.

Description.

[Based on 5 complete worms and 16 partial specimens] Worms 26.5–70.9 mm (n = 5) long, greatest width at level of mature proglottids, euapolytic; 164–214 (n = 5) proglottids per worm. Scolex 880–1,400 (n = 20) long by 680–1,170 (n = 20) wide, with four bothridia; maximum width of scolex at level of posterior margin of anterior loculus (Figs 3A, 4A). Bothridia free posteriorly, tri-locular, 770–1,230 (n = 20) long by 320–570 (n = 20) wide, with anterior muscular pad (Figs 3A, 4A). Muscular pad 250–325 (n = 18) wide, with apical sucker 75–150 (n = 19) and one pair of bipronged hooks at posterior margin (Figs 3A, 4A). Anterior loculus of bothridia 400–650 (n = 20) long; middle loculus 170–310 (n = 20) long; posterior loculus 150–340 (n = 20) long (Figs 3A, 4A); loculus length ratio (anterior:middle:posterior) 1:0.48:0.50. Velum between medial margins of bothridia in dorsal or ventral pairs not seen (Figs 3A, 4A). Hooks bipronged, hollow, with tubercle on proximal surface of axial prong; internal channels of axial and abaxial prongs continuous, smooth, base and anterior part of each hook embedded in musculature of scolex, tips of prongs free (Figs 3A, B, 4A). Bases (handles) of medial and lateral hooks articulate with one another (Figs 3B, 4A). Lateral hook measurements (n = 15): A 140–170, B 200–285, C 140–305, D 360–465; Medial hook measurements (n = 15): A’ 100–165, B’ 225–300, C’ 200–270, D’ 300–425. Cephalic peduncle 2.38–9.13 mm (n = 15) long by 0.15–0.23 mm (n = 15) wide, microtriches not seen on the scolex or cephalic peduncle (Figs 3A, 4A, B, C). Proglottids craspedote. Immature proglottids 50–230 (n = 17) long by 240–520 (n = 17) wide, mature proglottids 260–700 (n = 10) long by 300–790 (n = 10) wide (Fig. 3C), terminal proglottids 1,120 (n = 1) long by 480 (n = 1) wide. Genital pore marginal, irregularly alternating, 49%–63% (n = 9) of proglottid length from anterior end in mature proglottids; genital atrium present (Figs 3C, D, 4D). Testes arranged in two to three irregular columns on each side of the uterus, in frontal view testes wider than long in mature proglottids, 50–125 (n = 6) long by 40–50 (n = 6) wide (Fig. 3C). In terminal proglottids, anteriormost testes wider than long and posteriormost testes longer than wide. Total number of testes 50–76 (n = 10), aporal 26–40 (n = 10), poral 23–36 (n = 10), preporal 17–26 (n = 10), postporal 5–11 (n = 10). All testes located anterior to ovarian isthmus. Cirrus sac pyriform, 125–175 (n = 6) long by 30–75 (n = 6) wide in mature proglottids (Figs 3C, D, 4D). Cirrus armed. Vagina anterior to cirrus sac (Figs 3C, D, 4D),walls relatively thick, covered with gland cells. Vagina extending laterally from common genital atrium, following anterior margin of cirrus sac, weakly sinuous posteriorly along medial line of proglottid to oötype (Fig. 3C); vaginal sphincter absent. Seminal receptacle not seen. Ovary in mature proglottids H-shaped in frontal view (Fig. 3C); posterior lobes wider than anterior lobes. Ovarian isthmus approximately 2/3 of the distance from anterior end of ovary. Arms of ovary unequal in length, aporal arm always longer than poral arm (Fig. 3C). Aporal arm 150–260 (n = 8) long, reaching to posterior margin of cirrus sac, poral arm 125–225 (n = 8) long in mature proglottids, not reaching posterior margin of cirrus sac. Mehlis’ gland posterior to ovarian isthmus. Vitiellarium follicular, forming lateral bands, extending from near anterior margin of proglottid to near posterior margin of proglottid (Fig. 3C); follicles 15–20 (n = 8) long by 10–15 (n = 8) wide. Uterus thin-walled, saccate, extending from anterior margin of proglottid to near posterior margin of proglottid. Excretory ducts lateral. Gravid proglottids and eggs not seen.

Remarks.

There are 14 Category 6 species of Acanthobothrium that have been described worldwide. Of these, seven species have been found in the Pacific Ocean, four of which are amphi-American (Table 2). Acanthobothriumvidali sp. nov. also is a Category 6 species, bringing the total number to 15. Category 6 species have a total length >15 mm (the length of A.vidali sp. nov. is 26.5–70.9 mm), a strobila made up of > 50 proglottids (A.vidali sp. nov. has 164–214 proglottids), number of testes per proglottids ≤ 80 (A.vidali sp. nov. has 50–76 testes per proglottid), and the arms of the ovary are asymmetrical.

Table 2.

Comparison of Acanthobothriumvidali sp. nov. vs. Category 6 species of the genus from the Pacific Ocean. Abbreviations: No. Number; A Base (handle) length; B Axial prong length; C Abaxial prong length; D Total hook length. Note: the use of “–” without numerical values are measurement ranges that overlap those of A.vidali sp. nov.

Species of Acanthobothrium Total length (mm) No. of proglottids Diameter of accesory sucker (μm) Length of cirrus sac (μm) No. of testes per proglottid Measurements of hook (μm)
A B C D
Pacific coast of the Americas
A.vidali sp. nov. 26.5–70.9 164–214 75–150 125–175 50–76 140–170 200–285 140–305 360–465
A.gonzalesmugaburoi Severino & Sarmiento, 1979 – 38–63 – – – 50–87 67–123 57–120 146–219
A.maculatum Riser, 1955 – – – – – 72–78 72–78 75–78 135–141
A.obuncus Marques, Brooks & Barriga, 1997 – – 33–48 258–322 – 66 60–64 63–64 126–130
A.soberoni Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 – – 40–65 – – 45–88 43–90 65–100 86–158
Other parts of the Pacific Ocean
A.aetiobatidis (Shipley, 1900), Southwell, 1925 15–20 – – 200–250 23–28 – 120–130 120–130 250–280
A.arlenae Campbell & Beveridge, 2002 – – – – 17–26 – 160–179 – 289–344
A.rodmani Fyler, Caira & Jensen, 2009 – – – 190–234 17–26 – – – 335–357
Open in a new tab

As presented in Table 2, the new species can be distinguished from similar Category 6 species of Acanthobothrium that have been described from the Pacific Coast of the Americas (amphi-American species), and from others parts of Pacific Ocean by the measurementes given in Table 2. The total length of the new species (26.5–70.9 mm) is longer than that of A.aetiobatidis (Shipley, 1900) Southwell, 1925. The number of proglottids of the new species (164–214) is greater than that of A.gonzalesmugaburoi Severino & Sarmiento, 1979. The diameter of accessory sucker of the new species (75–150) is larger than that of A.obuncus (33–48) and A.soberoni (40–65). The length of the cirrus sac of the new species (125–175) is shorter than that of A.obuncus (258–322), A.aetiobatidis (200–250), and A.rodmani Fyler, Caira & Jensen, 2009 (190–234). The number of testes per proglottid of the new species (50–76) is greater than that of A.aetiobatidis (23–28), A.arlenae Campbell & Beverage, 2002 (17–26), and A.rodmani (17–26). Finally, the measurements of the hooks of the eight species can be found in Table 2.

The new species is the fourth species of Acanthobothrium reported from N.entemedor, preceded by A.franus and A.inbiorium (Category 5 species), and A.soniae sp. nov. (Category 2 species) described above. All species have been reported from the Pacific Coast of the Americas. Acanthobothriumvidali sp. nov. can be distinguished from these other species by number of proglottids (164–214) is greater than that of A.franus (68–141) and A.soniae sp. nov. (10–13). The total length of the lateral hook of A.vidali sp. nov. (360–465) is longer than that of A.inbiorium (95–120 µm). The length of the axial prong of the lateral hook of A.vidali sp. nov. (200–285) is longer than that of A.inbiorium (65–75 µm) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison of species of Acanthobothrium that have been reported from Narcineentemedor. Abbreviations: No. Number; A Base (handle) length; B Axial prong length; C Abaxial prong length; D Total hook length. Note: Information taken from the original descriptions and this study.

Species of Acanthobothrium Total length (mm) No. of proglottids Diameter of accesory sucker (μm) Length of cirrus sac (μm) No. of testes per proglottid Measurements of hook (μm)
A B C D
Reported from Narcineentemedor
A.franus Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997* 16.0–40.0 68–141 60–159 102–281 24–59 118–175 245–319 223–322 354–465
A.inbiorium Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 28.0–82.0 156–223 20–75 122–285 44–73 35–50 65–75 50–60 95–120
A.soniae sp. nov. 2.9–6.7 10–13 45–50 55–90 31– 47 43–45 88–105 83–93 125–138
A.vidali sp. nov. 26.5–70.9 164–214 75–150 125–175 50– 76 140–170 200–285 140–305 360–465
Open in a new tab

Discussion

To date, 190 valid species of Acanthobothrium have been reported from different regions of the world (Caira et al. 2017; Rodríguez-Ibarra et al. 2018; Franzese and Ivanov 2018). Forty species of Acanthobothrium have been described from the Pacific coast of the Americas (eleven species from USA, eleven from México, eight from Costa Rica, four from Ecuador, four from Peru, and three from Chile). With these descriptions of A.soniae sp. nov. and A.vidali sp. nov., 13 species of Acanthobothrium have been reported from the Pacific Coast of Mexico. A list of amphi-American species of Acanthobothrium from the Pacific coast, their hosts, and localities is given in Table 4.

Table 4.

Species of Acanthobothrium reported from the Pacific Ocean of the Americas (amphi-American species). ‡= Category designation obtained from Ghoshroy and Caira (2001). Category designations not included in Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) were calculated for this study using the original descriptions. Sources were as given by that author or the original descriptions used for this study.

Family / Host species Acanthobothrium species Type locality Source Category designation
Heterodontidae
Heterodontusfrancisci (Girard, 1855) A.bajaensis Appy & Dailey, 1973 San Quintin Bay, Baja California, Mexico Appy and Dailey (1973) 4‡
A.puertecitense Caira & Zahner, 2001 Puertecitos, Gulf of California, Mexico Caira and Zahner (2001) 4
H.mexicanus Taylor & Castro-Aguirre, 1972 A.santarosaliense Caira & Zahner, 2001 Santa Rosalia, Gulf of California, Mexico Caira and Zahner (2001) 3
Rhinobatidae
Pseudobatosproductus (Ayres, 1854) A.olseni Dailey & Mudry, 1968 Newport Beach, California, USA Dailey and Mudry (1968) 2‡
A.rhinobati Alexander, 1953 Santa Monica Harbor, California, USA Alexander (1953) 9(5)‡
A.robustum Alexander, 1953 Long Beach Harbor, California, USA Alexander (1953) 4‡
Platyrhinidae
Platyrhinoidistriseriata (Jordan & Gilbert, 1880) A.goldsteini Appy & Dailey, 1973 Seal Beach, California, USA Appy and Dailey (1973) 5(9)‡
Narcinidae
Diplobatisommata (Jordan & Gilbert, 1890) A.dollyae Caira & Burge, 2001 Bahía de Los Angeles, Gulf of California, Mexico Caira and Burge (2001) 1
A.maryanskii Caira & Burge, 2001 Loreto, Gulfo of California, Mexico Caira and Burge (2001) 5
A.royi Caira & Burge, 2001 Punta Arena, Gulf of California, Mexico Caira and Burge (2001) 1
Narcineentemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 A.franus Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 Cuajiniquil Beach, Gulf of Santa Helena, Guanacaste, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1997b) 5(8)‡
A.inbiorium Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 Cuajiniquil Beach, Gulf of Santa Helena, Guanacaste, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1997b) 5‡
A.soniae sp. n. Playa las Hamacas, Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico This study 2‡
A.vidali sp. n. Playa las Hamacas, Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico This study 6‡
Torpedinidae
Tetronarcecalifornica (Ayres, 1855) A.hispidum Riser, 1955 Monterey Bay, California, USA Riser (1955) 5‡
Rajidae
Rajastellulata (Gilbert, 1915) A.brachyacanthum Riser, 1955 Monterey Bay, California, USA Riser (1955) 2‡
Zearajachilensis (Guichenot, 1848) A.annapinkiensis Carvajal & Goldstein, 1971 Anna Pink Hay, Chile Carvajal-G. and Goldstein (1971) 2‡
Arhynchobatidae
Psammobatisscobina (Philippi, 1857) A.psammobati Carvajal & Goldstein, 1969 South Pacific Ocean, between Papudo and Talcahuano, Chile Carvajal-G. and Goldstein (1971) 5‡
Sympterygiabrevicaudata (Cope, 1877) A.lusarmientoi Severino & Verano, 1980 Callao, Lima, Peru Severino and Verano (1980) 7
Gymnuridae
Gymnuraafuerae (Hildebrand, 1946) A.atahualpai Marques, Brooks & Barringa, 1997 Puerto Bolivar, Provincia de El Oro, Ecuador Marques et al. (1997a) 1‡
Dasyatidae
Hypanusdipterurus (Jordan & Gilbert, 1880) A.bullardi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 Bahía de Los Angeles, Gulf of California, Mexico Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) 2‡
A.dasi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 Puertecitos, Gulf of California, Mexico Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) 2‡
A.rajivi Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 Puertecitos, Gulf of California, Mexico Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) 2‡
A.soberoni Ghoshroy & Caira, 2001 Puertecitos, Gulf of California, Mexico Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) 6‡
H.longus (Garman, 1880) A.cimari Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 Punta Morales, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1995) 2‡
A.cleofanus Monks, Brooks & Lonce de Leon, 1996 Chamela Bay, Jalisco, Mexico Monks et al. (1996) 3‡
A.costarricense Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 Punta Morales, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1995) 2‡
A.obuncus Marques, Brooks & Barriga, 1997 Puerto Hualtaco, Provincia de El Oro, Ecuador Marques et al. (1997a) 6‡
A.puntarenasense Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 Punta Morales, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1995) 2‡
A.vargasi Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 Punta Morales, Puntarenas Province, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1995) 2‡
Potamotrygonidae
Potamotrygonmotoro (Müller & Henle, 1841) A.peruviense Reyda, 2008 Madre de Dios River at Boca Manu, Madre de Dios Department, Peru Reyda (2008) 1(8)
Urotrygonidae
Urobatishalleri (Cooper, 1863) A.parviuncinatum Young, 1954 San Diego Bays, California, USA Young (1954) 8‡
U.tumbesensis (Chirichigno F. & McEachran, 1979) A.minusculus Marques, Brooks & Barriga, 1997 Puerto Hualtaco, Provincia de El Oro, Ecuador Marques et al. (1997a) 1‡
Urotrygonchilensis (Günther, 1872) A.campbelli Marques, Brooks & Monks, 1995 Costa de Pajaros, Puntarenas, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1995) 2‡
Myliobatidae
Myliobatiscalifornicus Grill, 1865 A.holorhini Alexander, 1953 Long Beach Harbor, California, USA Alexander (1953) 3‡
A.maculatum Riser, 1955 Monterey Bay, California, USA Rêgo et al. 1968 6(3)‡
A.microcephalum Alexander, 1953 Long Beach Harbor, California, USA Alexander (1953) 4‡
A.unilateralis Alexander, 1953 Long Beach Harbor, California, USA Alexander (1953) 7(2)‡
M.chilensis Philippi, 1892 A.coquimbensis Carvajal & Jeges, 1980 Antofagasta, Chile Carvajal-G. and Jeges-G. (1980) 2‡
M.peruvianus Garman, 1913 A.gonzalesmugaburoi Severino & Sarmiento, 1979 Callao, Lima, Peru Severino and Sarmiento (1979) 7(6)
Aetobatidae
Aetobatusnarinari (Euphrasen, 1790) A.monksi Marques, Brooks & Barriga, 1997 Puerto Jelí, Provincia de El Oro, Ecuador Marques et al. (1997a) 1‡
A.nicoyaense Brooks & McCorquodale, 1995 Punta Morales, Golfo de Nicoya, Costa Rica Brooks and McCorquodale (1995) 1‡
Scombridae (Perciformes)
Sardachiliensis (Cuvier, 1832) A.chilensis Rego, Vincednte & Herrera, 1968 Paita, Piúra, Peru Rêgo et al. (1968) 3‡
Open in a new tab

Host specificity of most species of Acanthobothrium appears to be rather strict (Ivanov, 2005; Vardo-Zalik and Campbell 2011; Franzese and Ivanov 2018). According to the reports of species of the genus (type localities, additional localities, type host, and additional host), 82% of the species of Acanthobothrium show strict host specificity. In contrast, 33 of the 190 valid species of Acanthobothrium have been reported in more than one species of host (see the reports of Rudolphi 1819; Yoshida 1917; MacCallum 1921; Léon-Borcéa 1935; Baer 1948; Euzet 1952; Yamaguti 1952; Young 1954; Riser 1955; Rees and Williams 1965; Goldstein 1967; Campbell 1969; Williams 1969; Carvajal-G. and Jeges-G. 1980; Rodriguez and Tantaleán-Vidaurre 1980; Brooks et al. 1981; Mayes and Brooks 1981; Escalante-A. 1986; Tantaleán-Vidaurre 1991; Marques et al. 1997a; Campbell and Beveridge 2002; Friggens and Brown 2005; Lacerda et al. 2008; and, Iannacone et al. 2011).

Prior to de Carvalho and Last (2016), the genus Narcine Henle, 1834 was composed of 20 species. To date, those taxa have been divided into two genera; 15 species of Narcine (tail length about equal to disc length or width) and 5 species of Narcinops de Carvalho & Last, 2016 (tail much longer tan disc length or width), this latter distributed only in Australia (Last et al. 2016). No helminths have been reported from the former members of Narcine that are now assigned to Narcinops. Five valid species of Acanthobothrium have been reported worldwide from three species of Narcine (Table 5) (Subhapradha, 1955; Goldstein et al. 1969; Brooks and Mayes 1978; Marques et al. 1997b), but no species of Acanthobothrium in Narcine have been reported from Mexico (Merlo-Serna and García-Prieto 2016). In Mexico, only two species of helminth have been reported previously from Narcine: Anaporrhutumeuzeti Curran, Blend & Overstreet, 2003 and Nagmiarodmani Curran, Blend & Overstreet, 2009 (Curran et al. 2003; Curran et al. 2009).

Table 5.

Species of Acanthobothrium reported in species of Narcine. † Data from Ghoshroy and Caira (2001); ‡ Data from Fyler and Caira (2006).

Narcine Species of Category Habitat of host Type locality Source
Narcine sp. (Reported as N.braunii, synonym of N.brasiliensis) A.indicum Subhapradha, 1955 ‡ 5 Northern Indian Ocean Madras Coast, India Subhapradha (1955)
N.bancroftii (Griffith & Smith, 1834) [reported as N.brasiliensis (Olfers, 1831)] A.lintoni Goldstein, Henson & Schlicht, 1968 † 1(8,9,5) North Carolina to northeastern Brazil Gulf of Mexico, Texas, USA Goldstein et al. (1969)
N. brasiliensis A.electricolum Brooks & Mayes, 1978 † 9 Brazil to northern Argentina Caribbean Sea, near Cartagena, Colombia Brooks and Mayes (1978)
N.entemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 A.franus Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 † 5(8) Baja California to northen Peru Cuajiniquil Beach, Gulf of Santa Helena, Guanacaste, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1997b)
A.inbiorium Marques, Centritto & Stewart, 1997 † 5 Baja California to northen Peru Cuajiniquil Beach, Gulf of Santa Helena, Guanacaste, Costa Rica Marques et al. (1997b)
A.soniae sp. nov. 2 Baja California to northen Peru Playa las Hamacas, Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico This study
A.vidali sp. nov. 6 Baja California to northen Peru Playa las Hamacas, Bahía de Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico This study
Open in a new tab

The categorical method suggested by Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) and Fyler and Caira, (2006) was used to facilitate comparisons among the 190 valid species of Acanthobothrium. Ghoshroy and Caira (2001) proposed the categories to facilitate comparisons among taxa from the same geographic region. Because of the large number of species worldwide, it is necessary to focus only on those species from the same region that possessing the same combination of characters as the new species; thus, delimiting the comparison between similar species that could be confused with a new species and not comparing each new species to all of the 190 valid species currently described. We agree that comparisons with each species of this expanding group is unnecessary and, as the number of species increases, an exercise in futility. In agreement with previous authors, this categorical method is useful but does not reflect groupings from a rigorous phylogenetic hypothesis (i.e., is phenetic) (Campbell and Beveridge 2002; Ivanov 2005; Reyda and Caira 2006; Twohig et al. 2008; Fyler and Caira 2010; Yang et al. 2016).

Although not all species of the genus have been examined, Franzese and Ivanov (2018) suggest that the pattern of microthiches is quite uniform among species of Acanthobothrium; (i.e., all species have filitriches covering most surfaces of the worms, interspersed with gladiate spinitriches on proximal bothridial surface, scolex proper and the cephalic peduncle). Because of insufficient material, it was not possible to make a study of this species using the SEM, so we cannot provide detailed information on the microtriches.

Supplementary Material

XML Treatment for Acanthobothrium soniae
zookeys.852.28964-treatment1.xml (44.2KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Acanthobothrium vidali
zookeys.852.28964-treatment2.xml (35.8KB, xml)

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all those who made possible the collection and examination of specimens. The authors would like to thank the curator Luis García-Prieto of the CNHE and Scott L Gardner and Gabor Racz (curator and collection manager, respectively) of the HWML, for providing access to laboratories and specimens. Students from the Laboratorio de Morfología Animal, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, and the Unidad Académica de Ecología Marina, Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, helped with the collection of specimens. This study was supported by funds from the project “Inventario Ambiental y Establecimiento de Indicadores Regionales de la Red Temática: Calidad Ambiental y Desarrollo Sustentable (PROMEP–SEP)”. The Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT) provided a scholarship (no. 432427) to FZ–T.

Citation

Zaragoza-Tapia F, Pulido-Flores G, Violante-González J, Monks S (2019) Two new species of Acanthobothrium Blanchard, 1848 (Onchobothriidae) in Narcine entemedor Jordan & Starks, 1895 (Narcinidae) from Acapulco, Guerrero, Mexico. ZooKeys 852: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.852.28964

References

  1. Alexander CG. (1953) Five new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from southern California rays. Journal of Parasitology 39: 481–486. 10.2307/3273847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Appy RG, Dailey MD. (1973) Two new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from elasmobranchs of the eastern Pacific. Journal of Parasitology 59: 817–820. 10.2307/3278414 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baer JG. (1948) Contributions a l’étude des cestodes de sélaciens I–IV. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Neuchâtel 71: 63–122. [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanchard E. (1848) Sur l’organisation des vers. Annales des Sciences Naturelles 10: 321–364. 10.5962/bhl.title.51506 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brooks DR, Mayes MA. (1978) Acanthobothriumelectricolum sp. nov. and A.lintoni Goldstein, Henson, and Schlicht, 1969 (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Narcinebrasiliensis (Olfers) (Chondrichthyes: Torpedinidae) in Colombia. Journal of Parasitology 64: 617–619. 10.2307/3279945 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brooks DR, Mayes MA. (1980) Cestodes in four species of euryhaline stingrays from Colombia. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 47: 22–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brooks DR, Mayes MA, Thorson TB. (1981) Systematic review of cestodes infecting freshwater stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae) including four new species from Venezuela. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 48: 43–64. [Google Scholar]
  8. Brooks DR, McCorquodale S. (1995) Acanthobothriumnicoyaense n. sp. (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) in Aetobatusnarinari (Euphrasen) (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes: Myliobatidae) from the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica. Journal of Parasitology 81: 244–246. 10.2307/3283927 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW. (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83: 575–583. 10.2307/3284227 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caira JN. (1985) Calliobothriumevani sp. nov. (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the Gulf of California, with a redescription of the hooks of C.lintoni and a proposal for onchobothriid hook terminology. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 52: 166–174. [Google Scholar]
  11. Caira JN, Burge AN. (2001) Three new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the ocellated electric ray, Diplobatisommata, in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Comparative Parasitology 68: 52–65. [Google Scholar]
  12. Caira JN, Jensen K, Healy CJ. (1999) On the phylogenetic relationships among tetraphyllidean, lecanicephalidean and diphyllidean tapeworm genera. Systematic Parasitology 42: 77–151. 10.1023/A:1006192603349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Caira JN, Jensen K, Ivanov VA. (2017) Onchoproteocephalidea II. In: Caira JN, Jensen K (Eds) Planetary biodiversity inventory (2008–2017): tapeworms from vertebrate bowels of the earth Special Publication, Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas Lawrence, Kansas, 290–315.
  14. Caira JN, Zahner SD. (2001) Two new species of Acanthobothrium Beneden, 1849 (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from horn sharks in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Systematic Parasitology 50: 219–229. 10.1023/A:1012241913722 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Campbell RA. (1969) New species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Chesapeake Bay, Virginia. Journal of Parasitology 55: 559–570. 10.2307/3277298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Campbell RA, Beveridge I. (2002) The genus Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) parastic in Australian elasmobranch fishes. Invertebrate Systematics 16: 273–344. 10.1071/IT01004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carvajal-G. J, Goldstein RJ. (1969) Acanthobothriumpsammobati n. sp. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the skate, Psammobatisscobina (Chondrichthyes: Rajiidae) from Chile. Zoologischer Anzeiger 182: 432–435. [Google Scholar]
  18. Carvajal-G. J, Goldstein RJ. (1971) Acanthobothriumannapinkiensis n. sp. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the skate, Rajachilensis (Chondrichthyes: Rajiidae) from Chile. Zoologischer Anzeiger 186: 158–162. [Google Scholar]
  19. Carvajal-G. J, Jeges-G. J. (1980) Cestodos parásitos de Myliobatischilensis Phillipi (Pisces: Myliobatidae), con la descripción de una nueva especie de Acanthobothrium. Anales del Centro de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología 7: 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chervy L. (2009) Unified terminology for cestode microtriches: a proposal from the International Workshops on Cestode Systematics in 2002–2008. Folia Parasitologica 56: 199–230. 10.14411/fp.2009.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Curran SS, Blend CK, Overstreet RM. (2003) Anaporrhutumeuzeti sp. nov. (Gorgoderidae: Anaporrhutinae) from rays in the Gulf of California, Mexico. In: Combes C, Jourdane J. (Eds) Taxonomy, Ecology and Evolution of Metazoan Parasites (Livre homage à Louis Euzet) Tome I.Presses Universitaires de Perpignan, Perpignan, France, 225–234.
  22. Curran SS, Blend CK, Overstreet RM. (2009) Nagmiarodmani n. sp., Nagmiacisloi n. sp., and Probolitrema richiardii (López, 1888) (Gorgoderidae: Anaporrhutinae) from Elasmobranchs in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Comparative Parasitology 76: 6–18. 10.1654/4356.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dailey MD, Mudry DR. (1968) Two new species of cestodes from California rays. Journal of Parasitology 54: 1141–1143. 10.2307/3276979 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. de Carvalho MR, Last PR. (2016) Chapter 15. Numbfishes, Family Narcinidae. In: Last PR, White WT, de Carvalho MR, Séret B, Stehman MFW, Naylor GJP, McEachran JD. (Eds) Rays of the World.Comstock Publishing Associates, a division of Cornell University Press; Clayton South VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing, Ithaca, New York, 137–169.
  25. Escalante-A. H. (1986) Cestodes de elasmobranquios de la costa peruana. Revista de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 74: 70–74. [Google Scholar]
  26. Euzet L. (1952) Cestodes tétraphyllides de la côte Atlantique du Maroc et de Mauritanie. (Collection resemblée par R. Ph. Dollfus). Comptes Rendus de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Maroc 5: 91–96. [Google Scholar]
  27. Euzet L. (1959) Recherches sur les Cestodes Tétraphyllides des Sélaciens de côtes de France. Docteur ès Sciences Naturelles, University of Montpellier, France.
  28. Franzese S, Ivanov VA. (2018) Hyperapolytic species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Onchoproteocephalidea) from batoids off Argentina. Parasitology International 67: 431–443. 10.1016/j.parint.2018.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Friggens MM, Brown JH. (2005) Niche partitioning in the cestode communities of two elasmobranchs. Oikos 108: 76–84. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2005.13275.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Froese R, Pauly D. (2018) FishBase. Version(02/2018). http://www.fishbase.org
  31. Fyler CA, Caira JN. (2006) Five new species of Acanthobothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the freshwater stingray Himanturachaophraya (Batoidea : Dasyatidae) in Malaysian Borneo. Journal of Parasitology 92: 105–125. 10.1645/GE-3522.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fyler CA, Caira JN. (2010) Phylogenetic status of four new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda : Tetraphyllidea) parasitic on the wedgefish Rhynchobatuslaevis (Elasmobranchii : Rhynchobatidae): implications for interpreting host associations. Invertebrate Systematics 24: 419–433. 10.1071/IS10034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ghoshroy S, Caira JN. (2001) Four new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the whiptail stingray Dasyatisbrevis in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 87: 354–372. 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0354:FNSOAC]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [PubMed]
  34. Goldstein RJ. (1967) The genus Acanthobothrium van Benden, 1849 (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea). Journal of Parasitology 53: 455–483. 10.2307/3276705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Goldstein RJ, Henson RN, Schlicht FG. (1969) Acanthobothriumlintoni sp. nov. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from the electric ray, Narcinebrasiliensis (Olfers) in the Gulf of Mexico. Zoologischer Anzeiger 181: 435–438. [Google Scholar]
  36. Iannacone J, Avila-Peltroche J, Rojas-Perea S, Salas-Sierralta M, Neira-Cruzado K, Palomares-Torres R, Valdivia-Alarcón S, Pacheco-Silva A, Benvenutto-Vargas V, Ferrario-Bazalar V. (2011) Dinámica poblacional de los parásitos metazoos del pez guitarra del pacífico Rhinobatosplaniceps (Batoidea: Rajiformes) de la zona costera marina de Lima, Perú. Neotropical Helminthology 5: 265–278. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ivanov VA. (2005) A new species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from the ocellate river stingray, Potamotrygonmotoro (Chondrichthyes: Potamotrygonidae), in Argentina. Journal of Parasitology 91: 390–396. 10.1645/GE-354R1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Lacerda ACF, Takemoto RM, Pavanelli GC. (2008) Digenea, Nematoda, Cestoda, and Acanthocephala, parasites in Potamotrygonidae (Chondrichthyes) from the upper Paraná River floodplain, states of Paraná and Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil. Check List 4: 115–122. 10.15560/4.2.115 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Last PR, White WT, de Carvalho MR, Séret B, Stehman MFW, Naylor GJP, McEachran JD. (2016) Rays of the World. Comstock Publishing Associates, a division of Cornell University Press; Clayton South VIC, Australia: CSIRO Publishing, Ithaca, New York, 790 pp. [Google Scholar]
  40. Léon-Borcéa L. (1935) Nouvelle note sur Acanthobothriumponticum L Borcéa (n. sp.). Annales scientifiques de l’Université de Jassy 20: 480–481. [Google Scholar]
  41. MacCallum GA. (1921) Studies in helminthology. Zoopathologica 1: 137–284. [Google Scholar]
  42. Maleki L, Malek M, Palm HW. (2013) Two new species of Acanthobothrium (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) from Pastinachuscf.sephen (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) from the Persian Gulf and Gulf of Oman. Folia Parasitologica 60: 448–456. 10.14411/fp.2013.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Marques F, Brooks DR, Barriga R. (1997a) Six species of Acanthobothrium (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea) in stingrays (Chondrichthyes: Rajiformes: Myliobatoidei) from Ecuador. Journal of Parasitology 83: 475–484. 10.2307/3284414 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Marques F, Brooks DR, Monks S. (1995) Five new species of Acanthobothrium van Beneden, 1849 (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) in stingrays from the Gulf of Nicoya, Costa Rica. Journal of Parasitology 81: 942–951. 10.2307/3284046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Marques F, Centritto R, Stewart AS. (1997b) Two new species of Acanthobothrium in Narcineentemedor (Rajiformes: Narcinidae) from the Northwest Coast of Guanacaste Peninsula, Costa Rica. Journal of Parasitology 83: 927–931. 10.2307/3284291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Merlo-Serna AI, García-Prieto L. (2016) A checklist of helminth parasites of Elasmobranchii in Mexico. ZooKeys 563: 73–128. 10.3897/zookeys.563.6067 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mayes MA, Brooks DR. (1981) Cestode Parasite of some Venezuelan Stingrays. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 93: 1230–1238. [Google Scholar]
  48. Monks S, Brooks DR, Pérez-Ponce de León G. (1996) A new species of Acanthobothrium Van Beneden, 1849 (Eucestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) in Dasyatislongus Garman (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatiformes: Dasyatididae) from Chamela Bay, Jalisco, Mexico. Journal of Parasitology 82: 484–488. 10.2307/3284090 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Monks S, Pulido-Flores G, Lara-Sánchez M. (2015a) Distribution extension of Acanthobothriumcartagenensis Brooks & Mayes, 1980 (Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) in Urobatisjamaicensis (Cuvier, 1816) (Myliobatiformes: Urotrygonidae) from Quintana Roo, México. Check List 11: 1–3. 10.15560/11.4.1707 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Monks S, Zaragoza-Tapia F, Pulido-Flores G, Violante-González J. (2015b) A new species of Serendip (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Serendipeidae) in Rhinopterasteindachneri (Chondrichthyes: Myliobatidae) from the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Comparative Parasitology 82: 262–268. 10.1654/4745.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Rees G, Williams HH. (1965) The functional morphology of the scolex and the genetalia of Acanthobothriumcoronotum (Rud.) (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea). Parasitology 55: 617–651. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Rêgo AA, Vicente JJ, Herrera NI. (1968) Sôbre dois novos parásitos de peixe da costa do Peru (Cestoda, Tetraphyllidea). Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 66: 145–149. 10.1590/S0074-02761968000200002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Reyda FB. (2008) Intestinal helminths of freshwater stingrays in southeastern Peru, and a new genus and two new species of cestode. Journal of Parasitology 94: 684–699. 10.1645/GE-1230.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Reyda FB, Caira JN. (2006) Five New Species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) from Himanturauarnacoides (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) in Malaysian Borneo. Comparative Parasitology 73: 49–71. 10.1654/4194.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Riser NW. (1955) Studies on cestode parasites of sharks and skates. Journal of the Tennessee Academy of Science 30: 265–311. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rodríguez-Ibarra E, Pulido-Flores G, Violante González J, Monks S. (2018) A new species of Acanthobothrium (Eucestoda: Onchobothriidae) in Aetobatuscf.narinari (Myliobatidae) from Campeche, México. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinária 27: 66–73. 10.1590/s1984-29612018009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Rodriguez TJ, Tantaleán-Vidaurre M. (1980) Estudio sobre helmintos de peces elasmobranquios de la costa Peruana. 1. Nuevos registros de Tetraphyllideos. Boletin Peruano de Parasitologia 2: 71–75. [Google Scholar]
  58. Rudolphi CA. (1819) Entozoorum synopsis, cui accedunt mantissa duplex et indices locupletissimi. Humboldt-Universität, Rücker, 811 pp 10.5962/bhl.title.9157 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Severino LR, Sarmiento BL. (1979) Neuva especie del genero Acanthobothrium Van Beneden 1849; Cestode: Tetraphyllidea de Myliobatisperuvianus Garman 1913. Revista de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 71: 38–43. [Google Scholar]
  60. Severino LR, Verano MR. (1980) Acanthobothriumlusarmientoi n. sp. (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea: Onchobothriidae) [de] Psammobatiscaudispina Hildebrand, 1941 (Chondrichtyes: Rajiidae) de Peru. Revista de Ciencias Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos 72: 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  61. Subhapradha CK. (1955) Cestode parasites of fishes of Madras coast. Indian Journal of Helminthology 7: 41–132. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tantaleán-Vidaurre M. (1991) Nuevos helmintos parasitos en peces elasmobranquio de la costa peruana. Boletin de Lima 73: 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  63. Twohig ME, Caira JN, Fyler CA. (2008) Two new cestode species from the dwarf whipray, Himanturawalga (Batoidea: Dasyatidae), from Borneo, with comments on site and mode of attachment. Journal of Parasitology 94: 1118–1127. 10.1645/GE-1475.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. van Beneden P-J. (1849) Notice sur un nouveau genre d’Helminte cestoïde. Bulletin de L’Académie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique 16: 182–193. [Google Scholar]
  65. van Beneden P-J. (1850) Recherches sur la faune littorale de Belgique. Les vers cestoides, considérés sous le rapport physiologique, embryogénique et zooclassique. Mémoires de l’Academie Royale des Sciences, des Lettres et des Beaux-Arts de Belgique 25: 1–204. 10.5962/bhl.title.47103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Vardo-Zalik AM, Campbell RA. (2011) Five new species of Acanthobothrium van Beneden, 1849 (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea) in elasmobranchs from the northwest Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico with the first records from smooth-hound sharks and guitarfish. Zootaxa 2828: 41–64. 10.11646/zootaxa.2838.1.3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Williams HH. (1960) A list of parasitic worms, including 22 new records, from marine fishes caught off the British Isles. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 2: 705–715. 10.1080/00222935908655756 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Williams HH. (1969) The genus Acanthobothrium van Beneden 1849 (Cestoda: Tetraphyllidea). Nytt Magasin for Zoologi 17: 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  69. Yamaguti S. (1952) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 49. Cestodes of fishes, II. Acta Medica Okayama 8: 1–97. [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang C, Sun Y, Zhi T, Iwaki T, Reyda FB, Yang T. (2016) Two new and one redescribed species of Acanthobothrium (Cestoda: Onchoproteocephalidea: Onchobothriidae) from Dasyatisakajei (Myliobatiformes: Dasyatidae) in the China Sea. Zootaxa 4169: 286–300. 10.11646/zootaxa.4169.2.3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Yoshida S. (1917) Some cestodes from Japanese selachians Including five new species. Parasitology 9: 560–592. 10.1017/S003118200000620X [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Young RT. (1954) Cestodes of sharks and rays in Southern California. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 21: 106–112. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

XML Treatment for Acanthobothrium soniae
zookeys.852.28964-treatment1.xml (44.2KB, xml)
XML Treatment for Acanthobothrium vidali
zookeys.852.28964-treatment2.xml (35.8KB, xml)

Articles from ZooKeys are provided here courtesy of Pensoft Publishers

RESOURCES