Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 10;9(2):172–176. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2018.07.003

Table 5.

Comparison of cephalometric changes related to the soft tissue profile between groups without tooth extraction (Group A) and with tooth extraction (Group B).

Cephalometric variables Change (Post-treatment – Pre-treatment)
p*
Without tooth extraction (n = 10)
With tooth extraction (n = 10)
Mean ±SD Mean ±SD
Nasolabial Angle (°) 2.05 ±8.20 3.5 ±9.8 0.76
Mentolabial Angle (°) 18.4 ±11.9 7.3 ±8.9 0.90
Interlabial Angle (°) 10.8 ±14.6 22 ±16.7 0.13
Facial Convexity Angle (°) −1.7 ±2.3 0.2 ±3.1 0.15
Total Facial Convexity Angle (°) −0.2 ±3.5 −0.2 ±3.2 0.81
Lower Face Angle (°) −2.3 ±47.8 −1.3 ±10.9 0.84
MAFH/LAFH Proportion −0.02 ±0.09 0.01 ±0.05 0.51
Lower Face Vertical Proportion −0.03 ±0.05 −0.02 ±0.06 0.93
H.NB Angle (°) −1.9 ±2.01 −3.2 ±4.1 0.62
Ricketts E Line (mm) −0.05 ±1.9 −0.2 ±3.7 0.67

* Mann-Whitney or independent Student T test. SD = standard deviation.