Table 3.
Cellular fatty acid composition (%) of strain Marseille‐P2849T and strain Marseille‐P3277T compared with other type strains of closely related species: 1, strain Marseille‐P2849T; 2, strain Marseille‐P3277T; 3, Gordonibacter urolithinfaciens strain CEBAS 1/15PT; 4, Gordonibacter pamelaeae strain 7‐10‐1‐bT; 5, Paraeggerthella hongkongensis DSM 16106T; 6, Eggerthella lenta DSM 2243T; 7, Eggerthella sinensis DSM 16107T
| Fatty acids | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C18:1n9 | 9‐octadecenoic acid | 36.4 | 38.1 | 27 | 6.8 | 55.1 | 42.3 | 36.6 |
| C16:0 | Hexadecanoic acid | 18.2 | 25.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 7.1 | 6.7 | 7.6 |
| C14:0 | Tetradecanoic acid | 12.7 | 10.9 | 5.2 | 16.3 | 6.9 | 12.5 | 7.7 |
| C15:0 anteiso | 12‐methyl‐tetradecanoic acid | 7.3 | 1.4 | 22.7 | 36.9 | 1.1 | 16.3 | 21.2 |
| C18:2n6 | 9,12‐octadecadienoic acid | 6.7 | 9 | ND | ND | 1.4 | ND | ND |
| C18:0 | Octadecanoic acid | 3.4 | 5.7 | 5.6 | 1.5 | 4.7 | 1.4 | 1.5 |
| C18:1n7 | 11‐octadecenoic acid | 3.2 | 3.7 | 1.4 | ND | 4.3 | 2.6 | 2.3 |
| C15:0 iso | 13‐methyl‐tetradecanoic acid | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 5.5 | 0 | 1.1 | 0 |
| C12:0 | Dodecanoic acid | 1.8 | 1.8 | TR | 5 | 7.7 | 2.9 | 1.1 |
| C13:0 iso | 11‐methyl‐dodecanoic acid | 1.5 | ND | TR | 2 | ND | ND | ND |
| C14:0 iso | 12‐methyl‐tridecanoic acid | 1.4 | ND | 13.4 | 18.3 | 0 | 7.5 | 17.1 |
| C15:0 | Pentadecanoic acid | 1.2 | 1.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| 13:0 anteiso | 10‐methyl‐dodecanoic acid | 1.1 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | 1 |
| C20:4n6 | 5,8,11,14‐eicosatetraenoic acid | TR | 1.2 | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C20:5n3 | 5,8,11,14,17‐eicosapentaenoic acid | ND | TR | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C5:0 iso | 3‐methyl‐butanoic acid | TR | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C13:0 | Tridecanoic acid | TR | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| C16:1n7 | 9‐hexadecenoic acid | TR | ND | 2 | 3.2 | 8.8 | 4.4 | 2.6 |
Values represent the percentage of total identified fatty acid methyl esters only (aldehydes, dimethyl acetals and unidentified “summed features” described previously were not included). Data of the close species were taken as reported by Selma et al. (2014).
ND: not detected; TR: trace amounts <1%.