Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 5;9:248–257. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.06.002

Table 1.

Prevalence of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium infections of owls in Thailand during September 2012–February 2018.

Bird species No. examined Haemoproteus Plasmodium H–Pa Total
Asian barred Owlet (ABO, Glaucidium cuculoides) 27 2 (7.4)b 8 (29.6) 0 10 (37.0)
Barn owl (BO, Tyto alba) 63 13 (20.6) 2 (3.2) 0 15 (23.8)
Collared scops-owl (CSO, Otus lettia) 37 19 (51.4) 1 (2.7) 0 20 (54.1)
Spotted owlet (SO, Athene brama) 27 4 (14.8) 1 (3.7) 0 5 (18.5)
Barred eagle-owl (BEO, Bubo sumatranus) 1 0 1 0 1
Buffy fish owl (BFO, Ketupa ketupu) 2 0 1 0 1
Brown hawk owl (BHO, Ninox scutulata) 4 2 1 0 3
Brown wood owl (BWO, Strix leptogrammica) 1 0 0 0 0
Oriental bay-owl (OBO, Phodilus badius) 1 1 0 0 1
Oriental scops-owl (OSO, Otus sunia) 2 0 0 1 1
Short-eared owl (SEO, Asio flammeus) 1 0 0 0 0
Spot-bellied eagle-owl (SBEO, Bubo nipalensis)
1
0
0
0
0
Grand total 167 41 (24.6) 15 (9.0) 1 (0.6) 57 (34.1)
a

Haemoproteus-Plasmodium co-infection.

b

Number of infected individuals are given, followed by prevalence data (in parentheses, percentage).