Skip to main content
. 2019 May 28;23:101880. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101880

Table 2.

Relationship between FA, MD, AD and RD and the battery of neurophysiological measures. Results from multiple linear regression analyses between the diffusion metrics across all ROIs and neurophysiological responses measured at the TA muscle. AD: mean diffusivity, CMCT: central motor conduction time, FA, fractional anisotropy, MD: mean diffusivity, MEP: motor evoked potential, PMCT: peripheral motor conduction time, RD: radial diffusivity, ROI: region of interest. N = 20. * = significant correlation following correction for multiple comparisons using false detection rate (FDR).

Diffusion metric ROI MEP amplitude MEP latency F-wave latency PMCT CMCT
FA
 Proximal r = 0.15 r = −0.07 r = −0.36 r = −0.39 r = 0.37
p = 0.65 p = 0.83 p = 0.16 p = 0.13 p = 0.23
 Mid r = 0.41 r = −0.14 r = −0.55 r = −0.54 r = 0.52
p = 0.90 p = 0.96 p = 0.02* p = 0.03* p = 0.09
 Distal r = 0.21 r = −0.22 r = 0.67 r = −0.02 r = −0.52
p = 0.51 p = 0.49 p = 0.79 p = 0.93 p = 0.08
MD
 Proximal r = −0.81 r = 0.10 r = 0.13 r = 0.15 r = −0.15
p = 0.80 p = 0.76 p = 0.62 p = 0.56 p = 0.63
 Mid r = −0.10 r = −0.13 r = 0.47 r = 0.35 r = −0.46
p = 0.075 p = 0.70 p = 0.06 p = 0.17 p = 0.13
 Distal r = −0.61 r = 0.21 r = −0.16 r = 0.08 r = 0.25
p = 0.04 p = 0.52 p = 0.54 p = 0.75 p = 0.44
AD
 Proximal r = −0.13 r = 0.17 r = −0.01 r = 0.06 r = 0.01
p = 0.68 p = 0.59 p = 0.99 p = 0.83 p = 0.99
 Mid r = −0.20 r = −0.03 r = 0.45 r = 0.35 r = −0.37
p = 0.53 p = 0.92 p = 0.07 p = 0.17 p = 0.23
 Distal r = −0.56 r = 0.36 r = −0.07 r = 0.18 r = 0.14
p = 0.06 p = 0.25 p = 0.80 p = 0.48 p = 0.67
RD
 Proximal r = −0.17 r = 0.13 r = 0.07 r = 0.11 r = −0.04
p = 0.59 p = 0.68 p = 0.78 p = 0.67 p = 0.90
 Mid r = −0.33 r = −0.02 r = 0.28 r = 0.19 r = −0.01
p = 0.30 p = 0.96 p = 0.28 p = 0.46 p = 0.97
 Distal r = 0.22 r = 0.55 r = −0.01 r = 0.14 r = 0.25
p = 0.50 p = 0.06 p = 0.98 p = 0.59 p = 0.43