Table 1.

Top filtered variants associated with loss of undercoat in WGS GWAS.

CFA28 Position	Ancestral Allele	Derived Allele	Wolf Derived	Double Derived	Single Derived	Wald p-Value *
24,860,187	C	T	0.0000	0.3731	0.91011	1.01 × 10−10
24,870,184	G	A	0.0571	0.3769	0.91573	3.37 × 10−11
24,851,582	G	C	0.1429	0.3918	0.9382	8.79 × 10−12
24,865,942	T	C	0.2286	0.3657	0.92135	2.23 × 10−12
24,862,630	A	G	0.2714	0.3657	0.91011	1.29 × 10−12
24,864,369	T	G	0.2857	0.4403	0.9382	4.75 × 10−11
24,866,307	T	G	0.3000	0.4403	0.9382	9.35 × 10−11
24,863,224	G	A	0.3143	0.3619	0.91011	4.04 × 10−13
24,865,980	C	T	0.3143	0.4366	0.9382	2.77 × 10−11
24,864,985	T	C	0.3429	0.444	0.94382	4.37 × 10−11
24,865,626	A	G	0.3429	0.444	0.9382	1.15 × 10−10
24,865,654	G	T	0.3571	0.4403	0.9382	6.42 × 10−11
24,852,776	A	AAGTCTTCAT	0.3714	0.4142	0.9382	6.11 × 10−11
24,853,325	T	TA	0.3714	0.3993	0.9382	1.99 × 10−11
24,866,155	C	A	0.3714	0.4366	0.9382	2.77 × 10−11
24,866,296	T	C	0.3714	0.4403	0.9382	9.35 × 10−11
24,865,525	A	G	0.3857	0.4403	0.9382	4.67 × 10−11
24,865,800	A	G	0.3857	0.4366	0.9382	4.45 × 10−11
24,866,114	C	A	0.3857	0.4366	0.9382	2.77 × 10−11
24,866,181	C	G	0.3857	0.4366	0.9382	2.77 × 10−11
24,866,484	G	A	0.3857	0.4478	0.9382	4.28 × 10−11
24,867,588	C	T	0.3857	0.3657	0.92135	2.23 × 10−12
24,854,456	A	ATTTGT	0.4143	0.3993	0.94944	6.77 × 10−13
24,864,154	A	T	0.4286	0.4403	0.9382	4.23 × 10−12
24,864,658	A	G	0.4286	0.4366	0.9382	2.77 × 10−11
24,863,186	C	CT	0.4429	0.4067	0.90449	2.54 × 10−12
24,865,062	A	AACAAC	0.4429	0.4403	0.9382	4.67 × 10−11
24,868,735	G	A	0.4429	0.3843	0.92135	2.87 × 10−11

* p-value derived from double- versus single-coated WGS GWAS. Bolded values indicate two variants for which in silico TF binding analysis was run.