Skip to main content
. 2019 May 25;9(5):280. doi: 10.3390/ani9050280

Table 4.

Effect of zinc supplementation, with and without phytase addition, on the percentage weights of the dressed carcass, carcass parts, inner organs, and abdominal fat in White Pekin ducks *.

Dressing (%) Front Part (%) Hind Part (%) Pancreas (%) Spleen (%) Liver (%) Gizzard (%) Heart (%) Abdominal Fat (%)
Zn addition
0 ppm 65.4 41.4 24 0.333 0.061 2.25 3.79 a 0.66 0.618
30 ppm 65.5 41.7 23.8 0.388 0.050 2.17 3.05 b 0.616 0.641
Phytase concentration
0 U/kg diet 66.6 42.3 24.2 0.352 0.055 2.39 a 3.42 0.638 0.790 a
500 U/kg diet 64.4 40.7 23.7 0.369 0.056 2.03 b 3.41 0.614 0.472 b
Interaction between Zn and phytase
0 ppm Zn + 0 U phytase 67.5 43.1 24.4 0.373 0.058 2.31 4.02a 0.693 0.820
0 ppm Zn + 500 U phytase 63.4 39.7 23.7 0.291 0.064 2.18 3.56 a,b 0.626 0.413
30 ppm Zn + 0 U phytase 65.6 41.6 23.9 0.332 0.051 2.46 2.83 c 0.622 0.748
30 ppm Zn + 500 U phytase 65.4 41.7 23.7 0.446 0.048 1.88 3.26 b 0.602 0.530
p value
Zn addition 0.9343 0.1353 0.7878 0.3446 0.075 0.5699 0.0001 0.5213 0.6869
Phytase concentration 0.0941 0.0729 0.4483 0.7761 0.8531 0.0123 0.9465 0.2596 0.0001
Interaction 0.1293 0.0602 0.7413 0.1188 0.4321 0.093 0.0288 0.5684 0.9421
RMSE 2.712 1.881 1.548 0.132 0.013 0.28 0.413 0.255 0.119

* n = 20 samples as five sample per each treatment; RMSE, Root mean square error. a–d means with different superscripts in the same column in similar treatment groups are significantly different; NS, not significant.