Table 3.
Comparisons of soccer player’s physical performance after three different warm-up conditions.
| % (CL90%) | ES (CL90%) | Chances | Outcome | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100%-1RM vs. 80%-1RM | ||||
| H3Jd | 5.1 (3.7; 6.5) | 0.79 (0.58; 1.00) | 100/0/0% | Most Likely |
| H3Jnd | 2.5 (1.1; 3.9) | 0.35 (0.15; 0.55) | 90/10/0% | Likely |
| SJ | 5.9 (3.3; 8.7) | 0.40 (0.22; 0.57) | 96/4/0% | Very Likely |
| CMJ | 5.7 (2.5; 9.1) | 0.38 (0.16; 0.59) | 92/8/0% | Likely |
| COD | 3.6 (1.4; 5.7) | 0.65 (0.25; 1.04) | 97/3/0% | Very Likely |
| RSCODb | 4.5 (3.6; 5.4) | 2.15 (1.70; 2.59) | 100/0/0% | Most Likely |
| RSCODt | 2.3 (1.6; 2.9) | 1.21 (0.84; 1.57) | 100/0/0% | Most Likely |
| S-30 | 0.8 (−2.1; 3.5) | 0.13 (−0.36; 0.63) | 41/47/12% | Possibly |
| 100%-1RM vs. 60%-1RM | ||||
| H3Jd | −2.3 (−5.6; 1.1) | −0.37 (−0.92; 0.17) | 4/24/71% | Possibly |
| H3Jnd | −3.5 (−6.8; −0.1) | −0.51 (−1.01; −0.01) | 1/13/86% | Likely |
| SJ | −6.1 (−11.8; 0.0) | −0.43 (−0.86; 0.00) | 1/16/83% | Likely |
| CMJ | 0.1 (−5.7; 6.2) | 0.01 (−0.39; 0.40) | 20/62/18% | Possibly trivial |
| COD | 0.1 (−2.4; 2.5) | 0.01 (−0.43; 0.46) | 23/57/20% | Possibly trivial |
| RSCODb | 0.9 (−0.9; 2.7) | 0.41 (−0.44; 1.26) | 67/22/11% | Possibly |
| RSCODt | 0.8 (0.2; 1.5) | 0.43 (0.08; 0.78) | 87/12/0% | Likely |
| S-30 | 1.9 (1.4; 2.4) | 0.34 (0.25; 0.43) | 99/1/0% | Very Likely |
| 60%-1RM vs. 80%-1RM | ||||
| H3Jd | 7.6 (4.3; 10.9) | 0.88 (0.51; 1.24) | 100/0/0% | Most Likely |
| H3Jnd | 6.2 (3.1; 9.4) | 0.90 (0.45; 1.34) | 99/1/0% | Very Likely |
| SJ | 12.9 (5.8; 20.3) | 0.72 (0.34; 1.11) | 98/2/0% | Very Likely |
| CMJ | 5.6 (0.3; 11.2) | 0.61 (0.04; 1.18) | 89/10/1% | Likely |
| COD | 3.6 (1.5; 5.9) | 0.87 (0.36; 1.39) | 98/2/0% | Very Likely |
| RSCODb | 3.8 (1.6; 6.0) | 1.46 (0.64; 2.29) | 99/1/0% | Very Likely |
| RSCODt | 1.5 (0.6; 2.4) | 0.69 (0.27; 1.10) | 97/3/0% | Very Likely |
| S-30 | −1.2 (−3.8; 1.6) | −0.16 (−0.53; 0.21) | 5/52/42% | Possibly |
To avoid a misinterpretation of the results, positive results denote a better performance in favor of the PAP warm-up protocol indicated at the right, while negative results denote a better performance in favor of the PAP warm-up protocol indicated at the left. CL, confidence limits; ES, effect size; PAP, post-activation potentiation; H3Jd and H3Jnd, triple hop test with dominant and non-dominant leg, respectively; SJ, squat jump; CMJ, countermovement jump; COD, change of direction ability test; RSCODb and RSCODt, repeated sprint with change of direction best and total times, respectively; S-30, linear 30-m sprint test. WU, control warm-up protocol; 100%-1RM, 80%-1RM, and 60%-1RM, PAP warm-up protocols at 60, 80, and 100% of one repetition maximum in half-squat.