Skip to main content
. 2019 Jan 15;108(6):1008–1015. doi: 10.1111/apa.14711

Table 2.

Summary of associations between physical activity and menarche timing: historical cohort studies

First author (citation) Country, Year published Sample size Dichotomised PA groups PA duration
Veronesi 26 Italy, 1994 n = 2930 Mean Difference (SE): AAM (years)
Ref: Moderate PA (2 h/wk)
  • Regular: 0.35 (0.144)

  • Intense: 0.66 (0.206)

p‐ANOVA <0.01
Chavarro 25 Colombia, 2004 n = 3206 Mean difference (95% CI): AAM (years)
Ref: Not physically active:
  • <1 h/d: 0.05 (‐0.04, 0.15)

  • 1–2 h/d: 0.07 (‐0.08, 0.2)

  • >2 h/d: 0.28 (0.06, 0.50)

p‐trend = 0.02, adjusted for Place of birth, Maternal education, Socio‐economic status, Family size, Year of birth, Year of interview
Vandeloo 27 Belgium, 2007 n = 1146 No sport vs. Some sport (Ref)
Hazard Ratio (95% CI): Time to menarche (year)
1.28 (1.054, 1.573)
p = 0.013
Papadimitriou 28 Greece, 2008 n = 750 Active vs. Passive
Mean difference (SE), AAM (year)
0.09 (0.09)
T‐test: p = 0.3
Morris 24 UK, 2010 n = 81 438 Linear regression coefficient (95% CI): AAM (years)
0.0983 (0.065, 0.133) per 10 h/wk PA
p < 0.01, adjusted for Ethnicity, Weight, Height, Number of siblings, Birth order, Maternal age, Twinning, Exposure to preeclampsia, Birthweight

PA = Physical activity, AAM = Age at menarche, Ref = Reference group.