Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 12;42(6):1847–1867. doi: 10.1111/pce.13527

Table 3.

Locations and effect sizes for the significant QTL arising from the QTL mapping via a MQM for water use, harvest index, and flowering time

QTL Position (cM) LOD score Proportion of total genetic variation 95% Bayesian credible interval (cM) P‐value Additive genetic effect (SE)
VWU1:1 9.00 1.88 4.25 0.00–28.00 <0.001 0.14 (0.05)
VWU3:1 34.00 3.42 7.90 10.00–46.00 <0.000 −0.19 (0.05)
VWU3:2 68.40 2.51 5.72 58.00–83.37 <0.000 −0.17 (0.05
FT1:1 6.00 3.64 5.51 0.00–16.00 <0.000 −2.74 (0.68)
FT4:1 3.70 18.09 34.93 2.00–6.00 <0.000 6.75 (0.64)
FT5:1 8.00 7.11 11.39 4.00–11.60 <0.000 −3.84 (0.65)
cPWU3:1 38.24 3.04 5.24 8.00–44.00 <0.000 −20.99 (5.77)
cPWU4:1 11.62 11.45 23.16 2.00–8.00 <0.000 47.05 (5.79)
cPWU5:1 7.93 7.04 14.85 2.55–11.60 <0.000 −34.80 (5.76)
Slope3:1 32.61 2.20 6.07 2.00–68.00 <0.001 0.20 (0.06)

The quantitative trait loci (QTL) names are given as the trait followed by the chromosome location. The position in cM, logarithm of the odd (LOD) score (LOD), proportion of total genetic variation, 95% Bayesian credible interval, P‐value, and additive genetic effect provided for all significant QTLs.