Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 2;14(9):471–476. doi: 10.6026/97320630014471

Table 3. Predicted ADME properties of selected compounds through Qikprop analysis.

S. No. Compound id Molecular weight (g per mol)a QP log P (o by w)b QPPCacoc QPLog HERG d LogPMDCKe Percentage of Human oral absorptionf
1 742503 (Specs database) 157.65 3.9 391.11 -6.781 124.3 95.61
2 742505 (Enamics) 476.81 4.87 535.24 -6.879 152.216 67.485
3 00007 (Maybridge database) 432.76 5.23 579.34 -5.853 159.289 66.815
4 95911396 (ZINC Database) 321.23 4.24 650.29 -6.234 168.578 85.698
5 00004(TOSLAB) 589.54 5.17 432.42 -5.867 162.578 80.141
aMolecular weight of the molecule. (Acceptable range 130.0-725.0.); bPredicted octanol/water partition coeffcient log P (acceptable range 2:0 to 6.5); cPredicted Caco-2 cell permeability in nm/s (acceptable range: less than 25 is poor and greater than 500 is great); dPredicted IC 50 value for blockage of HERG K+ channels (concern below -5:0); ePredicted apparent MDCK cell permeability in nm/s; fPercentage of human oral absorption (acceptable range: less than 25 percent is poor and greater than 80 percent is high)