Table 3. Predicted ADME properties of selected compounds through Qikprop analysis.
| S. No. | Compound id | Molecular weight (g per mol)a | QP log P (o by w)b | QPPCacoc | QPLog HERG d | LogPMDCKe | Percentage of Human oral absorptionf |
| 1 | 742503 (Specs database) | 157.65 | 3.9 | 391.11 | -6.781 | 124.3 | 95.61 |
| 2 | 742505 (Enamics) | 476.81 | 4.87 | 535.24 | -6.879 | 152.216 | 67.485 |
| 3 | 00007 (Maybridge database) | 432.76 | 5.23 | 579.34 | -5.853 | 159.289 | 66.815 |
| 4 | 95911396 (ZINC Database) | 321.23 | 4.24 | 650.29 | -6.234 | 168.578 | 85.698 |
| 5 | 00004(TOSLAB) | 589.54 | 5.17 | 432.42 | -5.867 | 162.578 | 80.141 |
| aMolecular weight of the molecule. (Acceptable range 130.0-725.0.); bPredicted octanol/water partition coeffcient log P (acceptable range 2:0 to 6.5); cPredicted Caco-2 cell permeability in nm/s (acceptable range: less than 25 is poor and greater than 500 is great); dPredicted IC 50 value for blockage of HERG K+ channels (concern below -5:0); ePredicted apparent MDCK cell permeability in nm/s; fPercentage of human oral absorption (acceptable range: less than 25 percent is poor and greater than 80 percent is high) | |||||||