Table 2.
Entry | Unit | Range | Num. LVs | Calibration (28 samples) | Validation (2×7 samples) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMSEC | RMSECV | RE [%] | R 2 Cal. | R 2 CV | RMSEP | R 2 Pred. | ||||
1 | M n | 4570 | 6 | 210 | 410 | 9.0 | 0.97 | 0.89 | 810 (510)[c] | 0.87 (0.98)[c] |
2 | log(M n) | 0.91 | 5 | 0.025 | 0.046 | 5.0 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 0.087 (0.050)[c] | 0.96 (0.99)[c] |
3 | M w | 29 984 | 6 | 1430 | 3100 | 10 | 0.96 | 0.81 | 3400 | 0.89 |
4 | log(M w) | 1.7 | 6 | 0.039 | 0.097 | 5.8 | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.094 | 0.98 |
5 | D | 4.9 | 6 | 0.22 | 0.51 | 10 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 0.98 |
6 | β‐O‐4 | 12 | 6 | 0.25 | 0.46 | 3.8 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.56 | 0.98 |
7 | β‐5 | 3.8 | 6 | 0.095 | 0.18 | 4.7 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.27 | 0.97 |
8 | β‐β | 1.8 | 3 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 10 | 0.94 | 0.87 | 0.15 | 0.94 |
9 | SB5 | 8.0 | 3 | 0.79 | 1.0 | 13 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 1.2 | 0.90 |
10 | SB1 | 7.9 | 5 | 0.26 | 0.48 | 6.1 | 0.98 | 0.94 | 0.39 | 0.94 |
[a] Values reported to 2 significant figures; see Figure S3 for the regression vectors associated with these models. [b] Pred.=predicted. [c] The relatively large RMSECV/RMSEP ratio can indicate overfitting. In this case it results from an outlier sample in the M n measurements due to the poor solubility of the acetone/MeOH fraction in the GPC solvent. Exclusion of this data results in a better prediction (shown in brackets).