Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 1;12(6):1139–1146. doi: 10.1002/cssc.201802809

Table 3.

Results measured by GPC and HSQC NMR spectroscopy and predicted by the PLS model for the validation set of kraft lignins. Predicted values are an average of two ATR‐FTIR measurements.[a]

Property EtOAc/MeOH Acetone/MeOH
0 % 5 % 10 % 20 % 30 % 40 % 50 %
M n [b] measured 710 1100 1400 2000 2500 2700 2400[c]
predicted 690 1100 1600 2200 2800 3300 3700
M w [b] measured 1100 1900 2700 4400 8100 11 000 14 000[c]
predicted 950 1600 2500 4300 7100 11 000 24 000
D measured 1.6 1.7 1.9 2.1 3.3 4.0 6.03[c]
predicted 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.5 2.3 3.2 5.6
β‐O‐4 measured 1.5 3.3 5.5 8.5 9.6 13 12
predicted 1.2 3.7 6.0 8.3 10 12 12
β‐5 measured 0.7 1.2 2.2 3.0 3.5 4.2 3.6
predicted 0.5 1.5 2.3 3.1 3.8 4.0 4.1
β‐β measured 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.8 2.4
predicted 1.3 1.6 1.9 2.2 2.4 2.6 2.6
SB5 measured 9.4 9.7 7.9 4.5 5.1 4.1 3.2
predicted 10 8.4 6.6 5.0 3.7 2.8 1.8
SB1 measured 4.6 2.0 1.1 0.9 0.4 0.5 0.3
predicted 4.4 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.05

[a] Values >1 reported to 2 significant figures, <1 reported to 1 significant figure. [b] Calculated from log[X]‐predicted values; see Table S6 for raw values. [c] Sample not fully soluble in THF after acetylation and values most likely underestimated with respect to the whole sample.