Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb;149(2):216–221. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1_18

Table III.

Detection of carbapenemases in Pseudomonas spp. by phenotypic methods

Phenotypic method n (%) Sensitivity% (CI)
MHT 20 (20.4) 18 (0.11-0.26)
IMI-IMI/EDTA E-test 105 (94.6) 95.4 (0.89-0.98)
MERO-MERO/EDTA E-test 51 (69.8) 67 (0.58-0.74)
CAZ + 2 MPA 102 (90.3) 92.7 (0.85-0.96)
CPM + 2 MPA 96 (85.7) 87 (0.79-0.92)
IMI-IMI + 2 MPA 77 (69.4) 71 (0.60-0.78)
MERO-MERO + 2 MPA 3 (2.99) 0.27 (0.07-0.8)
EDTA impregnated IMI disc 79 (68.7) 71 (0.62-0.79)
EDTA impregnated CAZ disc 77 (65.25) 70 (0.60-0.78)
IMI + BA disc 60 (54.1) 54 (0.44-0.63)
MERO + BA disc 41 (36.6) 37 (0.28-0.47)
CTN + BA disc 23 (21.5) 20 (0.13-0.29)
CPM + BA disc 57 (50.4) 51 (0.42-0.61)
CEF + BA disc 47 (43.5) 42 (0.33-0.52)
CAZ + BA disc 34 (30.1) 69 (0.59-0.77)
CTX + BA disc 46 (44.6) 41 (0.32-0.51)

MHT, modified Hodge test; IMI, imipenem; MERO, meropenem; MPA, mercaptonoic acid inhibition test; EDTA, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid; CAZ, ceftazidime; BA, boronic acid; CTN, cefoxitin; CPM, cefepime; CEF, cefoxitin; CTX, cefotaxime; CI, confidence interval