Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb;149(2):208–215. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_172_18

Table III.

Comparison of antibiotic resistance profile of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing and non-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae identified by combined disc test method

Antibiotics E. coli K. pneumoniae


ESBLs, % (n/N)* Non-ESBLs, % (n/N) ESBLs, % (n/N) Non-ESBLs, % (n/N)
AMK 5 (8/167) 12 (75/202) 57 (56/98) 43 (54/126)
CTX 59 (99/167) 61 (123/202) 87 (85/98) 57 (72/126)
CAZ 58 (97/167) 65 (132/202) 85 (83/98) 60 (76/126)
CIP 61 (56/92) 58 (111/191) 59 (58/98) 45 (57/126)
CFD 93 (13/14) 59 (32/54) 94 (50/53) 45 (25/56)
CHL 24 (15/62) 13 (12/90) 14 (9/64) 21 (16/76)
CFS-SUL 14 (13/92) 46 (49/107) 73 (66/90) 48 (57/119)
CST 2 (2/88) 0 0 7 (8/119)
ERT 34 (10/29) 48 (29/61) 21 (11/53) 43 (27/63)
FEP 55 (92/167) 64 (129/202) 85 (83/98) 57 (72/126)
IMP 4 (7/167) 34 (69/202) 44 (43/98) 48 (60/126)
MER 15 (14/92) 48 (92/193) 53 (52/98) 54 (68/126)
TET 66 (58/88) 50 (52/103) 33 (29/89) 15 (18/119)
TZP 11 (18/167) 53 (108/202) 66 (65/98) 51 (64/126)

*% (n/N), per cent (number of resistant isolate/total number of isolate). AMK, amikacin; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; FEP, Cefepime; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; IMP, imipenem; MER, meropenem, CFS-SUL, cefoperazone-sulbactam, TET, tetracycline; ERT, ertapenem; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CFD, cefpodoxime; CHL, chloramphenicol; CST, colistin