Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2019 Apr 8;252:253–262. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.04.050

Table 1.

Relationship between LRS scores and activation profiles for each contrast, with HamD covaried.

Affective_CPT
MNI Coordinates
Region x y z t Cluster extent p (peak)
Neg vs Neu
Basal Ganglia 22 14 19 3.93 2034 <0.001
Anterior Cingulate −10 33 13 4.75 5022 <0.001
Hippocampus 24 −40 6 3.21 303 0.002
Parahippocampus Orbitofrotal cortex −39 15 −15 3.95 1243 <0.001
Parietal cortex 21 −73 49 5.01 870 <0.001
Dorsal prefrontal cortex 12 50 25 4.75 739 <0.001
Precuneus 20 −72 46 4.51 3811 <0.001
Neg vs Pos
Basal Ganglia 12 15 4 4.57 2512 <0.001
Anterior Cingulate −14 39 7 3.95 3069 <0.001
Hippocampus 22 −39 6 2.22 21 0.019
Parahippoc ampus - - - - - -
Orbitofrotal cortex 22 54 −6 4.43 567 <0.001
Parietal cortex 46 −43 37 3.91 1784 <0.001
Dorsal prefrontal cortex 52 36 18 5.06 630 <0.001
Precuneus 8 −64 37 4.57 3292 <0.001
Neu vs Pos
Basal Ganglia −4 10 12 3.23 216 0.002
Anterior Cingulate - - - - - -
Hippocampus - - - - - -
Parahippoc ampus - - - - - -
Orbitofrotal cortex 24 48 −14 2.83 56 0.005
Parietal cortex 44 −58 49 3.56 747 0.001
Dorsal prefrontal cortex 51 36 18 2.68 278 0.007
Precuneus 10 −64 34 3.27 310 0.002