Table 2.
AT8 and Tau-1 staining intensities.
| AT8 | Tau-1 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | N30∗ | N∗ | ER∗ | R6# | R38 | C | N∗ | R38∗ | |
| Amb | - | +++ | ++∗ | +∗ | -# | - | ++ | ++ | + |
| NTS | + | + | ++∗ | ++ | -∗# | - | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| dMV | + | ++ | ++∗ | ++ | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| Rpa | ++ | ++ | +++ | ++ | +# | ++ | + | + | -∗ |
| LC | - | ++ | +∗ | + | - | - | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| LPB | - | +∗ | ++∗ | ++∗ | -# | - | ++ | + | + |
| VLPAG | + | + | + | + | -∗# | - | +++ | ++ | ++ |
| Cb-Cx | - | + | +∗ | + | - | - | + | + | + |
| MM | - | ++∗ | ++++∗ | ++∗ | +∗# | + | ++ | ++ | ++ |
| LH | + | ++ | +++∗ | ++∗ | -∗# | - | +++ | +∗ | ++∗ |
| Arc | - | ++∗ | +++∗ | ++∗ | +# | + | +++ | ++∗ | ++ |
| DM | - | + | +∗ | +∗ | -# | - | +++ | + | ++ |
| PVH | - | +++∗ | +++∗ | ++∗ | -#§ | +∗ | +++ | +∗ | ++ |
| PV | - | + | +∗ | + | -# | - | +++ | ++ | ++ |
| VLPO | - | +++∗ | ++++∗ | +∗ | -# | + | +++ | ++∗ | ++ |
| MnPO | - | ++∗ | +++∗ | +∗ | -# | - | +++ | +∗ | ++ |
| CA3 | + | + | +++∗ | ++∗ | -∗# | - | ++ | + | + |
| PRh | - | ++ | +∗ | + | -# | - | ++++ | ++ | ++∗ |
| P-Cx | + | ++ | + | + | -∗# | - | +++ | +∗ | ++∗ |
Brain structures are listed in order from caudal to rostral. See Table 1 and Figure 2 for acronym definition. Staining intensities are represented in a qualitative scale (see Supplementary Figure S1), ranging from “-” (no staining) to “++++” (maximum staining observed). Results are the average of two independent blind evaluations by different experimenters. C, control; N30, samples taken during the induction of synthetic torpor (ST), when brain temperature (Tb) reached 30°C; N, samples taken at nadir of hypothermia, during the ST; ER, early recovery, samples taken when Tb reached 35.5°C following ST; R6, samples taken 6 h after ER; R38, samples taken 38 h after ER. Statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) are shown: ∗ vs. C; #R6 vs. ER; § R6 vs. R38.