Table 2.
Resistance to peer influence interaction with perceived frequency of peer binge drinking (Model A) and actual frequency of peer binge drinking (Model B) predicting participant frequency of binge drinking.
Predictors | b | SE | z |
---|---|---|---|
Model A | |||
Sexa | − 0.65 | 0.13 | − 5.17*** |
Athlete | 0.25 | 0.19 | 1.31 |
Substance free dorm resident | − 0.56 | 0.19 | − 2.90** |
RPI total | − 0.16 | 0.06 | −2.71** |
Perceived frequency of peer binge drinking | 1.60 | 0.07 | 23.83*** |
RPI × perceived frequency of peer binge drinking | − 0.13 | 0.06 | − 2.25* |
Model B | |||
Sexa | − 0.47 | 0.12 | − 4.06*** |
Athlete | 0.19 | 0.15 | 1.26 |
Substance free dorm resident | − 0.39 | 0.16 | − 2.37* |
RPI total | − 0.15 | 0.06 | − 2.36* |
Actual frequency of peer binge drinking | 1.78 | 0.06 | 31.12*** |
RPI × actual frequency of peer binge drinking | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.22 |
RPI = Resistance to peer influence.
Birth sex was coded 0 = male, 1 = female.
p < 0.05; p < 0.001.
p < 0.01.
p < 0.001.