Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 3;17(6):e3000294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000294

Table 1. Comparison of statistical data on the genomes of 10 Tetrahymena species.

Species MAC Genome Size (Mb) N50 (MAC) (Kb) Number of Scaffolds (MAC) GC Content (%) Number of Genes MIC Genome Size (Mb) N50 (MIC) (Kb)
T. thermophila1 103.0 637 1,158 22.3 26,996 157.7 487
T. malaccensis2 106.7 496 554 22 24,866 140.3 65
T. elliotti 90.8 711 331 22.4 22,925 NA NA
T. pyriformis 116.1 603 367 28 26,866 NA NA
T. vorax 114.8 658 512 28.3 25,238 NA NA
T. borealis 93.5 639 325 23.6 20,694 NA NA
T. canadensis 103.4 416 1,637 23.9 25,188 NA NA
T. empidokyrea 84.9 447 558 25.6 20,847 NA NA
T. shanghaiensis 95.6 154 2,660 20.1 21,982 NA NA
T. paravorax 108.4 574 448 28.4 25,551 NA NA

1MAC and MIC genomes of T. thermophila are previously published data (TGD Wiki, http://ciliate.org). All other genomes are newly sequenced.

2Draft MIC genome of T. malaccensis was sequenced by Pacbio SMRT sequencing technology; the N50 value refers to contig length.

Abbreviations: GC, Guanine and Cytosine; MAC, macronucleus; MIC, micronucleus; N50, the sequence length of the shortest contig at 50% of the total genome length; NA, not available; SMRT, single-molecule real-time; TGD, Tetrahymena Genome Database.