Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2019 Jul 1;81(3):311–318. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002032

Table 3.

Diagnostic characteristics of different binary drug concentration thresholds to predict virological suppression (<50 copies/mL) using both established drug concentration cut-off values and alternative cut-off values (indicated by *) that maximised sensitivity and specificity in ROC analyses.

Tenofovir-diphosphate (TFV-DP) in DBS
Select TFV-DP cut-off values Probability of virologic suppression1 Sensitivity2 (%) Specificity3 (%) PPV4 (%) NPV5 (%) Correctly classified6 (%)
>LLOQ >0.190 97.7 73.5 86.9 94.7 89.1
≥350 ≥0.464 92.1 81.6 90.0 85.1 88.3
≥399* ≥0.515 92.1 83.7 91.0 85.4 89.1
≥700 ≥0.787 73.9 87.8 91.5 65.2 78.8
≥1250 ≥0.975 33.0 98.0 96.7 44.9 56.2
≥1850 ≥0.998 6.8 100.0 100.0 37.4 40.2
Plasma tenofovir (TFV)
Select plasma TFV cut-off values Probability of virologic suppression1 Sensitivity2 (%) Specificity3 (%) PPV4 (%) NPV5 (%) Correctly classified6 (%)
>LLOQ ≥0.411 88.6 77.6 87.6 79.2 84.7
≥23.5* ≥0.586 78.4 79.6 87.3 67.2 78.8
≥35.5 ≥0.750 64.8 85.7 89.1 57.5 72.3
Plasma efavirenz (EFV)
Select plasma EFV cut-off values Probability of virologic suppression1 Sensitivity2 (%) Specificity3 (%) PPV4 (%) NPV5 (%) Correctly classified6 (%)
>LLOQ ≥0.253 97.7 75.5 87.8 94.9 89.8
≥0.70 ≥0.483 89.8 79.6 88.8 81.3 86.1
≥1.00 ≥0.605 85.2 81.6 89.3 75.5 83.9
≥1.13* ≥0.636 81.8 83.7 90.0 71.9 82.5
≥4.00 ≥0.995 14.8 95.9 86.7 38.5 43.8
1

Probability estimated from logistic regression models.

2

Proportion of subjects with a viral load <50 copies/mL who were detected using this cut-off

3

Proportion of subjects with a viral load ≥50 copies/mL who were detected using this cut-off

4

Positive Predictive Value: proportion of those who were detected with this drug concentration cut-off who had a viral load <50 copies/mL

5

Negative Predictive Value: proportion of those who were not detected with this drug concentration cut-off who had a viral load ≥50 copies/mL

6

Overall proportion of those above and below the cut-off who were correctly classified. Note that this proportion is always biased towards the larger group.