Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 19;7(6):e674. doi: 10.1002/mgg3.674

Table 4.

Evaluation of the NIPSCCD method in detecting CNVs

CNV size TP FP FN Sensitivity (%) PPV (%) FNR (%)
>10 Mb 11 2 1 91.67 84.62 9.33
5 Mb–10 Mb 5 2 0 100.00 71.43 NA
<5 Mb 13 3 6 68.42 81.25 31.58
Total CNVs 29 7 7 80.56 80.56 19.44

TP, true positive NIPSCCD‐detected CNVs that were confirmed by amniocytes testing; FP, inconsistent CNVs that were detected by NIPSCCD while not detected by amniocytes testing were classified as false positive; FN, amniocytes testing‐characterized CNVs that were not detected by the NIPSCCD method; PPV, positive predictive value; FNR, false negative rate; NA, not applicable.