Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jun 14.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Med. 2019 Apr 1;49(7):1218–1226. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000667

Table 1.

Results of the most significant MR approach among those surviving Bonferroni multiple testing correction for each of the MR tests conducted

Test Method SNP n Estimate P Concordance Het. (P > 0.05) MR-Egger intercept (P > 0.1)
ACF→AD Egger 92 −1.97 2.51×10−11 pass violated violated
ACF×10−5→AD Egger 773 −0.75 3.24×10−06 pass violated violated
ACF×10−5→MD IVW 795 0.07 6.50×10−20 violated violated violated
ACQ→AD IVW 31 0.12 3.81×10−11 pass violated violated
ACQ→MD IVW 30 0.01 8.06×10−05 violated violated pass
ACQ×10−5→AD IVW 385 0.06 7.34×10−20 pass violated violated
ACQ×10−5→MD IVW 405 0.01 2.43×10−17 violated violated violated
AD×10−5→ACF Egger 96 −0.05 9.11×10−48 pass violated violated
AD×10−5→ACQ IVW 95 0.26 3.26×10−36 pass violated pass
MD→ACF IVW 36 0.05 4.06×10−08 pass violated pass
MD→ACQ Egger 36 −4.77 1.93×10−10 pass violated violated
MD×10−5→ACF IVW 252 0.02 1.27×10−08 violated violated pass
MD×10−5→ACQ IVW 251 0.31 1.46×10−06 violated violated violated
MD×10−5→AD IVW 259 0.28 1.29×10−06 pass pass pass

ACF, alcohol consumption frequency; ACQ, alcohol consumption quantity; AD, alcohol dependence; MD, major depression; Het., heterogeneity test; suggestive loci (P < 5× 10−5). All top-results reported in the table were obtained using fixed effects and tophits adjustments (see online Supplemental Table S2)