Skip to main content
. 2019 May 16;8(3):167–176. doi: 10.1007/s40037-019-0511-8

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics for BASiC-QI scale items

Mean (SD)
PRE POST (SD) p-value 95% CI
Subscale 1: Attitudes and Beliefs  50.0 (6.59)  54.8 (6.71)  4.77 (7.21) 0.000***  2.91, 6.63
1. I enjoy QI   4.54 (0.850)   5.63 (1.03)  1.092 (1.10) 0.000*  0.809, 1.375
2. I am interested in QI   5.64 (0.898)   5.83 (1.03)  0.190 (1.11) 0.191 −0.097, 0.477
3. I understand the role QI plays in the health system   5.34 (1.17)   6.20 (0.605)  0.862 (1.21) 0.000*  0.548, 1.175
4. QI plays an important role in strengthening systems, such as healthcare   5.87 (0.911)   6.30 (0.743)  0.435 (1.01) 0.002*  0.173, 0.697
5. I value QI training as part of my professional development   5.71 (0.884)   6.12 (0.904)  0.405 (1.04) 0.004*  0.135, 0.675
6. I want to participate in QI initiatives as a health professional   5.71 (0.884)   6.00 (0.957)  0.288 (1.11) 0.048  0.003, 0.574
7. Applications of QI theory and methodologies can help make change to a system   5.81 (0.892)   6.15 (1.04)  0.337 (1.13) 0.024  0.045, 0.628
8. Using QI in the real world will make improvements   5.80 (0.879)   6.32 (0.676)  0.520 (0.910) 0.000*  0.285, 0.755
9. I understand the rationale for QI in the real world   5.61 (1.12)   6.23 (0.795)  0.640 (1.18) 0.000*  0.336, 0.944
Subscale 2: Knowledge of QI  25.7 (11.1)  49.4 (7.41) 23.7 (10.2) 0.000*** 21.1, 26.4
1. QI theory   2.64 (1.40)   5.22 (1.14)  2.58 (1.51) 0.000*  2.99, 12.7
2. How QI is different than research   3.26 (1.68)   5.48 (1.13)  2.23 (1.63) 0.000*  2.65, 10.6
3. Systems thinking   2.98 (1.56)   5.08 (1.21)  2.10 (1.53) 0.000*  2.50, 10.7
4. 6 dimensions of quality   2.43 (1.44)   5.73 (1.18)  3.30 (1.64) 0.000*  3.73, 15.6
5. Understanding processes within a system   3.00 (1.62)   5.30 (1.23)  2.30 (1.49) 0.000*  2.69, 12.0
6. The Model for Improvement   2.50 (1.38)   5.27 (1.18)  2.77 (1.29) 0.000*  3.10, 16.6
7. PDSA cycles   2.15 (1.34)   5.83 (1.04)  3.68 (1.57) 0.000*  4.08, 18.2
8. How to measure the impact of a change   3.27 (1.53)   5.70 (0.850)  2.43 (1.51) 0.000*  2.82, 12.5
9. How change links to improvement   3.48 (1.54)   5.82 (0.701)  2.33 (1.49) 0.000*  2.72, 12.1
Subscale 3: QI Skills  27.8 (10.3)  53.3 (14.3) 25.5 (13.5) 0.000*** 22.0, 29.0
1. Understanding quality gaps   2.68 (1.12)   4.42 (1.20)  1.73 (1.17) 0.000**  2.04, 11.5
2. Identifying quality gaps   2.81 (1.10)   4.72 (1.26)  1.91 (1.38) 0.000**  2.27, 10.7
3. Approach quality improvement projects   2.12 (1.09)   4.30 (1.42)  2.18 (1.38) 0.000**  2.53, 12.2
4. Understand root causes of quality gaps   2.25 (0.962)   4.13 (1.36)  1.89 (1.29) 0.000**  2.22, 11.4
5. Identifying an area for improvement   3.00 (1.11)   4.70 (1.21)  1.70 (1.27) 0.000**  2.03, 10.4
6. Application of evidence and best practices to the real world   2.81 (1.17)   4.32 (1.46)  1.51 (1.57) 0.000**  1.91, 7.47
7. Writing an aim statement   2.12 (0.975)   4.57 (1.43)  2.44 (1.38) 0.000*  2.80, 13.7
8. Using tools to identify areas for improvement   2.09 (1.03)   4.45 (1.33)  2.36 (1.33) 0.000**  2.71, 13.8
9. Using the Model for Improvement   1.77 (0.939)   4.25 (1.42)  2.48 (1.39) 0.000**  2.84, 13.9
10. Using PDSA cycles to plan and test a change   1.49 (0.866)   4.67 (1.28)  3.18 (1.35) 0.000**  3.53, 18.2
11. Designing an intervention or change   2.44 (1.06)   4.47 (1.41)  2.03 (1.46) 0.000**  2.41, 10.8
12. Use a family of measures to evaluate the impact of a change   2.18 (1.18)   4.28 (1.39)  2.11 (1.55) 0.000**  2.51, 10.5
TOTAL SCORE 103.5 (24.4) 157.5 (25.1) 54.99 (25.5) 0.000*** 47.4, 60.6

*statistical significance at p < 0.005 level; **statistical significant at p < 0.004 level; ***statistical significant at p < 0.0125 level; Bonferroni corrections used to correct for multiple comparisons