Table 2.
Factor loadings | |||
---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | |
Subscale 1: Attitudes and Beliefs | |||
1. I enjoy QI | 0.212 | 0.644 | 0.101 |
2. I am interested in QI | 0.110 | 0.795 | – |
3. I understand the role QI plays in the health system | 0.189 | 0.703 | – |
4. QI plays an important role in strengthening systems, such as healthcare | – | 0.842 | – |
5. I value QI training as part of my professional development | −0.140 | 0.971 | – |
6. I want to participate in QI initiatives as a health professional | – | 0.744 | 0.124 |
7. Applications of QI theory and methodologies can help make change to a system | – | 0.931 | – |
8. Using QI in the real world will make improvements | – | 0.878 | – |
9. I understand the rationale for QI in the real world | – | 0.973 | – |
Subscale 2: Knowledge of QI | |||
1. QI theory | – | 0.108 | 0.798 |
2. How QI is different than research | – | – | 0.475 |
3. Systems thinking | −0.124 | −0.210 | 0.997 |
4. 6 dimensions of quality | – | 0.124 | 0.676 |
5. Understanding processes within a system | – | – | 0.812 |
6. The Model for Improvement | 0.148 | 0.148 | 0.601 |
7. PDSA cycles | – | – | 0.714 |
8. How to measure the impact of a change | 0.484 | – | 0.133 |
9. How change links to improvement | 0.280 | 0.437 | 0.213 |
Subscale 3: QI Skills | |||
1. Understanding quality gaps | 0.934 | – | – |
2. Identifying quality gaps | 0.955 | – | −0.168 |
3. Approach quality improvement projects | 0.842 | – | – |
4. Understand root causes of quality gaps | 0.693 | – | 0.226 |
5. Identifying an area for improvement | 0.937 | – | −0.192 |
6. Application of evidence and best practices to the real world | 0.743 | – | 0.212 |
7. Writing an aim statement | 0.945 | – | −0.165 |
8. Using tools to identify areas for improvement | 0.921 | – | – |
9. Using the Model for Improvement | 0.935 | – | 0.114 |
10. Using PDSA cycles to plan and test a change | 0.894 | – | – |
11. Designing an intervention or change | 0.878 | – | – |
12. Use a family of measures to evaluate the impact of a change | 0.783 | – | 0.140 |
Proportion of variance | 0.323 | 0.224 | 0.140 |
Variance component % | 32.3% | 22.4% | 14.0% |
Extraction method: Maximum likelihood estimation with promax oblique minimum rotation