Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;9:7730. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3

Table 2.

The odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of reporting good health and high well-being as a function of nature visit duration in the last 7 days.

Self-reported health (Good vs. poor) Subjective well-being (High vs. low)
Unadjusted Adjusteda Unadjusted Adjusteda
OR 95% CIs OR 95% CIs OR 95% CIs OR 95% CIs
Low High Low High Low High Low High
Nature visit exposure
Weekly visit duration
≥300 mins 1.73*** 1.57 1.91 1.33*** 1.18 1.50 1.42*** 1.31 1.54 1.20*** 1.09 1.31
240–299 mins 2.10*** 1.74 2.53 1.55*** 1.25 1.93 1.45*** 1.24 1.68 1.25** 1.07 1.46
180–239 mins 1.74*** 1.47 2.06 1.44*** 1.18 1.76 1.33*** 1.16 1.53 1.16* 1.00 1.34
120–179 mins 2.09*** 1.79 2.44 1.59*** 1.31 1.92 1.37*** 1.21 1.55 1.23** 1.08 1.40
60–119 mins 1.56*** 1.34 1.83 1.13 0.94 1.37 1.21** 1.06 1.39 1.10 0.96 1.27
1–59 mins 1.14 0.88 1.46 1.04 0.76 1.41 1.05 0.83 1.31 0.99 0.78 1.26
0 mins ref ref ref ref ref ref ref ref ref ref ref ref
Covariates
Area NO YES NO YES
Individual NO YES NO YES
Constant 2.61 2.50 2.72 0.28 0.24 0.33 1.34 1.29 1.39 0.36 0.31 0.41
Pseudo R2 0.01 0.23 0.01 0.05
Valid N 20,264 19,806 20,264 19,806

Notes. aFull models including covariates (urbanicity, neighbourhood greenspace, area deprivation, background PM10, sex, age, SES, restricted functioning, physical activity, employment status, relationship status, ethnicity, children in household, dog ownership and year) available in Supplementary Table 2. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.