Skip to main content
. 2019 May 15;12(10):1594. doi: 10.3390/ma12101594

Table 2.

Comparison of the ratios of the tested to calculated shear capacity.

Identifier λ vf (%) Equation (7) Equation (8) Equation (9) Equation (10)
FL-1a 2.0 0.8 0.925 0.986 0.853 0.949
FL-1b 2.0 0.8 1.014 1.080 0.934 1.040
FL-2a 1.0 0.8 0.972 0.864 0.961 1.055
FL-2b 1.0 0.8 0.951 0.846 0.940 1.032
FL-3a 1.5 0.8 1.115 1.146 0.946 1.111
FL-3b 1.5 0.8 1.107 1.135 0.941 1.107
FL-4a 2.0 0.8 0.985 1.004 0.887 1.006
FL-4b 2.0 0.8 1.023 1.043 0.921 1.045
FL-5a 2.5 0.8 1.1143 1.120 1.269 1.236
FL-5b 2.5 0.8 1.064 1.069 1.212 1.180
FL-6a 3.0 0.8 1.2264 1.148 1.215 1.473
FL-6b 3.0 0.8 1.168 1.094 1.157 1.403
FL-7a 3.5 0.8 1.246 1.102 1.102 1.351
FL-7b 3.5 0.8 1.315 1.163 1.163 1.426
FL-8a 2.0 0.8 1.063 1.102 1.008 1.142
FL-8b 2.0 0.8 1.002 1.038 0.950 1.077
FL-9a 2.0 0.8 0.945 0.955 0.812 0.923
FL-9b 2.0 0.8 0.945 0.955 0.812 0.923
FL-10a 2.0 0 0.962 0.915 0.754 0.861
FL-10b 2.0 0 0.914 0.869 0.717 0.818
FL-11a 2.0 0.4 0.867 0.952 0.794 0.901
FL-11b 2.0 0.4 0.920 1.010 0.842 0.954
FL-12a 2.0 1.2 1.024 1.036 0.955 1.083
FL-12b 2.0 1.2 0.967 0.979 0.902 1.023
FL-13a 2.0 0.8 0.936 0.965 0.873 1.001
FL-13b 2.0 0.8 0.999 1.028 0.937 1.077
Mean ratio - - 1.029 1.023 0.956 1.084
Variation coefficient - - 0.109 0.089 0.154 0.159