Table 4.
Results of logistic regression analyses between food intake and recommended daily physical activity a.
| High intake of Food Group |
Boys (n = 4557) Daily Physical Activity Level |
Girls (n = 5073) Daily Physical Activity Level |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medium | High | Medium | High | ||
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | ||
| Soft drinks | Model 1 | 0.8 (0.7–1.0) | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 0.8 (0.6–1.0) | 0.8 (0.7–1.1) |
| Model 2 | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.8 (0.7–1.0) | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | |
| Juice | Model 1 | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 1.3 (1.0–1.5) | 1.2 (1.0–1.6) |
| Model 2 | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | |
| Water | Model 1 | 1.2 (0.9–1.4) | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 1.0 (0.9–1.2) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) |
| Model 2 | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | |
| Milk | Model 1 | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) | 1.6 (1.2–2.2) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) |
| Model 2 | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) | 1.7 (1.3–2.2) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 1.3 (1.0–1.7) | |
| Dairy products | Model 1 | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 1.4 (1.1–1.7) |
| Model 2 | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 1.4 (1.1–1.7) | |
| Fast food | Model 1 | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.0 (0.9–1.3) | 0.9 (0.8–1.2) |
| Model 2 | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | |
| Fruits | Model 1 | 1.9 (1.5–2.3) | 2.1 (1.7–2.7) | 1.5 (1.3–1.9) | 1.9 (1.6–2.4) |
| Model 2 | 1.8 (1.5–2.3) | 2.1 (1.6–2.7) | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) | 1.9 (1.6–2.3) | |
| Vegetables | Model 1 | 1.4 (1.1–1.7) | 1.6 (1.2–2.0) | 1.4 (1.2–1.7) | 1.6 (1.2–2.0) |
| Model 2 | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.5 (1.2–2.0) | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.5 (1.2–1.9) | |
| Bread | Model 1 | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 1.5 (1.2–1.8) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.2 (1.0–1.6) |
| Model 2 | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 1.5 (1.2–1.9) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | |
| Potatoes/pasta/rice | Model 1 | 1.1 (0.8–1.3) | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 1.2 (1.0–1.4) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) |
| Model 2 | 1.1 (0.8–1.3) | 1.4 (1.1–1.8) | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | |
| Meat | Model 1 | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 1.0 (0.8–1.1) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) |
| Model 2 | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | |
| Breakfast cereals | Model 1 | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.4 (1.1–1.7) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) |
| Model 2 | 1.3 (1.0–1.6) | 1.3 (1.1–1.6) | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.2 (1.0–1.5) | |
| Savoury snacks | Model 1 | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | 1.0 (0.8–1.3) | 0.8 (0.6–0.9) | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
| Model 2 | 1.1 (0.9–1.3) | 1.1 (0.9–1.4) | 0.8 (0.7–1.0) | 0.9 (0.7–1.1) | |
| Confectionery | Model 1 | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | 1.6 (1.2–2.0) | 0.8 (0.6–0.9) | 0.9 (0.8-1.1) |
| Model 2 | 1.2 (0.9–1.5) | 1.6 (1.2–2.0) | 0.8 (0.6–0.9) | 1.0 (0.8–1.2) | |
1 Model adjusted for age; 2 Model adjusted for age and socioeconomic status; a low: <3 days/week 1 h/day (reference group), medium: 3–5 days/week 1 h/day, high: 6–7 days/week 1 h/day; OR—odds ratio; CI—confidence interval; bold: The odds ratio is significantly different from 1 (reference is low RDPA with p < 0.05).