Skip to main content
. 2019 May 4;9(5):696. doi: 10.3390/nano9050696

Table 2.

Evaluation of the Risk pre-assessment tools, according to 9 relevant criteria. + Criterion fulfilled; − Criterion not fulfilled; ± Criterion not fully fulfilled; NA Criterion not applicable/available.

Criteria
Tool Easy to Use/Understand, User-Friendliness Quantitative Information Uncertainty Analysis Documented Applications/Trustworthiness Transparency of Application/Process Comprehension Influence on Final Policy Structured Decision-Making Fair and Knowledgeable Communication Process
iNTeg-Risk Radar + + + + NA +
Nano-Risk Radar + + + ± + +
IKnow + + + ± + +
FORCE IDSS + + + + +
UK Gov Horizon Scanning Centre + + + + +
Futurescaper’s HS platform + + + + +
RAHS + + + + +
Cranfield U Horizon Scanning + + + + +
Swiss Re SONAR + + + + +
Allianz Risk Barometer + + + + +
Causal diagram assessment + + + ± + +
MCDA procedure for prioritization of Occupational Risks from NMs - + + + + + + +
MCDA procedure for prioritization of occupational exposure scenarios of NMs - + + + + + + +
MCDA procedure for hazard screening of ENMs - + + + + + + +
Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA-TRI) - + + +- + + + +
Tool for ENM-Application Pair Risk Ranking (TEARR) + ± + + + +
Screening Tree Tool + + + + + +
NRST (Nanomaterial Risk-Screening Tool) + + + + + + +
NanoRiskCat + + + + ± + +
NanoGRID + ± + + + ± + +
CB NanoTool ± + + ± + +
ANSES CB nanotool ± ± + + + ± + +
NanoSafer CB Tool + + + + + ± + +
Stoffenmanager Nano ± + + + ± + +
Precautionary Matrix + ± ± ± ± + +