Skip to main content
. 2019 May 21;20(10):2499. doi: 10.3390/ijms20102499

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Comparison of the top scoring prediction of CS (green) and AutoDock Vina (pink) with respect to the co-crystallized ligand (light blue). In (A), the binding site of mmp13 (PDB: 830C) is depicted. It can be observed that CS predicts a near-native pose as top scoring, while AutoDock Vina places its top scoring pose far away from the binding pocket. The opposite scenario can be observed in panel (B) in the binding site of urok (PDB: 1SQT).