Skip to main content
. 2019 May 18;19(10):2300. doi: 10.3390/s19102300

Table 3.

Analysis of the positioning error of Euclidean-WKNN based on simulation data.

Actual Position RSS of AP1 and AP2 Differential RSS from RP1 Differential RSS from RP2 SED from RP1 and RP2 Estimated Position Position Error
AP1 0
AP2 5
RP1 10 (−59.30, −50.99)
RP2 22 (−68.75, −65.66)
TP1 12 (−61.49, −55.02) (2.19, 4.03) (7.26, 10.64) (4.59, 12.88) 13.15 1.15
TP2 14 (−63.33, −58.04) (4.03, 7.05) (5.42, 7.62) (8.12, 9.35) 15.58 1.58
TP3 16 (−64.93, −60.44) (5.63, 9.45) (3.82, 5.22) (11.00, 6.47) 17.56 1.56
TP4 18 (−66.35, −62.44) (7.05, 11.45) (2.40, 3.22) (13.45, 4.02) 19.24 1.24
TP5 20 (−67.61, −64.16) (8.31, 13.17) (1.14, 1.50) (15.57, 1.88) 20.70 0.70