Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;20:492. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5880-1

Table 1.

Details of mapping RRBS libraries to the porcine genome (Sscrofa11.1) using bismark (Bowtie 2)

Sample ID Clean reads Unique alignments Mapping efficiency CpG methylation Non-CpG methylation
DuPi_11 25,598,295 13,016,706 50.8% 44.0% 8.1%
DuPi_12 33,475,531 16,674,560 49.8% 45.2% 8.7%
DuPi_56 33,731,881 17,385,378 51.5% 45.2% 8.0%
DuPi_57 29,270,325 15,359,097 52.5% 44.8% 8.5%
DuPi_60 31,094,984 15,763,028 50.7% 44.2% 9.4%
Duroc_38 28,869,589 14,725,935 51.0% 43.7% 8.1%
Duroc_42 23,517,510 12,022,839 51.1% 44.8% 9.1%
Duroc_43 35,098,019 19,596,737 55.8% 45.2% 10.2%
Duroc_58 35,688,527 18,941,344 53.1% 44.5% 9.4%
Duroc_61 30,005,918 15,453,489 51.5% 44.5% 8.0%
PiPP_23 30,088,721 15,743,823 52.3% 44.7% 9.3%
PiPP_48 28,917,500 15,104,512 52.2% 43.3% 8.2%
PiPP_51 34,649,573 18,386,095 53.1% 44.6% 8.6%
PiPP_52 29,679,615 15,433,031 52.0% 44.1% 7.9%
PiNN_41 31,118,398 16,512,344 53.1% 44.5% 9.0%
PiNN_47 25,844,090 13,465,314 52.1% 44.6% 8.2%
PiNN_49 30,608,401 16,929,760 55.3% 45.3% 9.0%