Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 24;47(6):2666–2673. doi: 10.1177/0300060519844399

Table 2.

Overview of results from the three different culture systems in the analysis of sputum samples from 565 patients with suspected pulmonary tuberculosis

Smear Sample n
M-MGIT

A-MGIT

L-J

All systems

Positive growth
−ve or Con
Positive growth
−ve or Con
Positive growth
−ve or Con
Positive growth
−ve or Con
MTC NTM MTC NTM MTC NTM MTC NTM
+ve AFB 77 58 (75.3) 13 (16.9) 6 (7.8) 60 (77.9) 12 (15.6) 5 (6.5) 56 (72.7) 10 (13.0) 11 (14.3) 63 (81.8) 12 (15.6) 2 (2.6)
−ve AFB 488 164 (33.6) 2 (0.4) 322 (66.0) 167 (34.2) 4 (0.8) 317 (65.0) 123 (25.2) 1 (0.2) 364 (74.6) 178 (36.5) 6 (1.2) 304 (62.3)
Total 565 222 (39.3) 15 (2.6) 328 (58.1) 227 (40.2) 16 (2.8) 322 (57.0) 179 (31.7) 11 (1.9) 375 (66.4) 241 (42.6) 18 (3.2) 306 (54.2)

Data are presented as n or n (%).

M-MGIT™, manual Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube; A-MGIT, automated Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube (BACTEC™ MGIT™ 960); L-J, Löwenstein-Jensen culture method; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; +ve, positive; −ve, negative; Con, contaminated