Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 13;5(8):1141–1149. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.1048

Table 3. ORR Subgroup Analysis in the Efficacy-Evaluable Population.

Patient Subgroup No./Total No. of Patients ORR, % (90% CI)a
All 11/60 18 (11-29)
Platinum status
Resistant 6/29 21 (9-37)
Refractory 2/16 13 (2-34)
Not applicableb 3/15 20 (6-44)
Prior lines of therapyc
1-2 7/25 28 (14-46)
≥3 4/35 11 (4-24)
Prior bevacizumab use
Yes 7/37 19 (9-33)
No 4/23 17 (6-36)
tBRCA statusd
tBRCAmut 2/11 18 (3-47)
tBRCAwt 9/47 19 (10-31)
PD-L1 statusd
Positive 7/33 21 (10-36)
Negative 2/21 10 (2-27)
HRD statusd
HRD positive 3/21 14 (4-33)
HRD negative 6/32 19 (9-34)

Abbreviations: HRD, homologous recombination deficiency; ORR, objective response rate; PD-L1, programmed death-ligand 1; tBRCA, tumor BRCA; tBRCAmut, tumor BRCA mutation; tBRCAwt, tumor BRCA wild type.

a

Includes only confirmed responses using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1.

b

Includes patients with an interval free of platinum-based chemotherapy of at least 180 days but unable to receive further platinum-based chemotherapy (owing to toxic effects or allergic reaction).

c

For pooled analysis, neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, and the combination of both were considered to be 1 line of therapy. Small molecules, hormonal agents, and bevacizumab were not counted in the lines of therapy.

d

Only patients with known biomarker status were included.