Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 14;2019(6):CD001008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001008.pub3

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Hypnotherapy versus behavioural treatments or no treatment for smoking cessation.

Hypnotherapy versus behavioural treatments or no treatment for smoking cessation
Patient or population: people who smoke
 Intervention: hypnotherapy
 Comparison: behavioural treatments or no treatment
Outcomes Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (studies) Certainty of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with control Risk with Hypnotherapy
Hypnotherapy versus attention‐matched behavioural treatments
Smoking cessation at 6+ months follow‐up
Study population RR 1.21
(0.91 to 1.61)
957
 (6 studies) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
Low1,2
 
150 per 1,000 182 per 1,000
(137 to 242)
Hypnotherapy versus brief attention/advice/smoking cessation education (not matched for contact time)
Smoking cessation at 6+ months follow‐up
  RR 0.98
(0.57 to 1.69)
269
 (2 studies) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low3,4
 
160 per 1,000 157 per 1,000
(91 to 271)
Hypnotherapy versus intensive behavioural interventions (not matched for contact time)
Smoking cessation at 6+ months follow‐up
Study population RR 0.93
(0.47 to 1.82)
211
(2 studies)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low3,4
 
142 per 1,000 132 per 1,000
(67 to 258)
Hypnotherapy versus no treatment
Smoking cessation at 6+ months follow‐up
Study population RR 19.00
(1.18 to 305.88)
40
 (1 study) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
Very low3,4
 
Non‐calculable (0 events in control group) Non‐calculable
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 
 CI: Confidence interval; RR: Risk ratio
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1 Downgraded one level due to imprecision: fewer than 300 events overall
 2 Downgraded one level due to risk of bias: three of the six included studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in at least one domain, and two were judged to be at unclear risk
 3 Downgraded two levels due to imprecision: fewer than 100 events overall
 4 Downgraded one level due to risk of bias: all studies contributing to the comparison were judged to be at high risk of bias