Table 3. Households’ benefits as estimated for various prevention scenarios (results from the survey conducted in Athens [21]).
Benefits (€/household/year) and their confidence intervals | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
West Nile virus risk reduction | Tiger mosquito health risk reduction | Night nuisance reduction | Day nuisance reduction | Total benefits | |
High prevention scenario against all mosquito species | 10.38 [6.6, 13.8] |
13.86 [10.5, 17.2] |
5.76 [3.6, 7.9] |
1.3 [-0.9, 3.9] |
31.30 [19.8, 42.8] |
Medium prevention scenario against all mosquito species | 5.19 [3.3, 6.9] |
13.86 [10.5, 17.2] |
2.21 [1.4, 3.0] |
0.10 [-0.1, 0.3] |
21.36 [15.1, 27.4] |
High prevention scenario against native mosquito species | 10.38 [6.6, 13.8] |
- | 5.76 [3.6, 7.9] |
- |
16.14 [10.2, 21.7] |
Medium prevention scenario against native mosquito species | 5.19 [3.3, 6.9] |
- | 2.21 [1.4, 3.0] |
- |
7.40 [4.7, 9.9] |