Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: West J Nurs Res. 2019 Jan 22;41(7):1032–1055. doi: 10.1177/0193945918822323

Table 6.

Latent Class Analysis Fit Statistics.

LL BIC (LL) N L2 df
All Symptoms without Covariates
 Two-Cluster Model −3,577.0327 7,320.303 27 1,772.142 8,164
 Three-Cluster Model −3,532.6907 7,317.817 41 1,683.458 8,150
 Four-Cluster Model −3,942.4829 7,323.599 55 1,603.042 8,136
 Five-Cluster Model −3,464.7162 7,354.263 69 1,547.509 8,122
Latent Class Fit Statistics—All Symptoms with Age, Race, Sex entered as Covariates
 Two-Cluster Model −3,561.0188 7,306.683 30 6,010.456 167,912
 Three-Cluster Model −3,511.2717 7,311.821 47 5,910.962 16,910
 Four-Cluster Model −3,458.3531 7,310.617 64 5,805.125 167,909
 Five-Cluster Model −3,428.3237 7,355.190 81 5,745.066 167,909

Note. LL = Log-likelihood; BIC = Bayesian information criteria.