Table 3.

Effect of reflexology on having specific health services at week 11 (N=180) ^a

	Unweighted, Unadjusted		Weighted, Unadjusted b
	Reflexology vs. Control(ref)		Reflexology vs. Control(ref) c
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Oncology visits	0.72	[0.30,1.74]	0.96	[0.35,2.61]
Emergent care visits	0.72	[0.30,1.51]	0.68	[0.30,1.52]
Hospital visits	0.53	[0.28,1.00]	0.49*	[0.25,0.97]
Other service visits d	0.63	[0.32,1.26]	0.80	[0.37,1.70]
	Unweighted, Adjusted e		Weighted, Adjusted b,e
	Reflexology vs. Control(ref) c		Reflexology vs. Control(ref) c
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Oncology visits	0.74	[0.27,2.06]	0.75	[0.24,2.34]
Emergent care visits	0.71	[0.30,1.68]	0.67	[0.27,1.69]
Hospital visits	0.35**	[0.16,0.75]	0.30**	[0.13,0.66]
Other service visits d	0.59	[0.25,1.37]	0.70	[0.32,1.52]

OR = odds ratio; CI = confidence interval; ref = reference.

^*p < 0.05

^**p < 0.01

^***p < 0.001

^a.Outcomes were dichotomized as zero versus one or more visit

^b.Inverse probability weighting with the probability for remaining in the study by week 11 estimated by logistic regression using baseline covariates in Table 1

^c.Baseline data missing for four patients

^d.Other service visits include laboratory visits, primary care provider visits, social worker visits, psychology visits, support group visits, nurse visits

^e.Adjusted by baseline covariates in Table 1.