Table 4.

Effect of reflexology on absenteeism and presenteeism at week 11 (N=58)^a

	Unweighted, Unadjusted		Weighted, Unadjusted b
	Reflexology vs. Control		Reflexology vs. Control
	Coefficient	95% CI	Coefficient	95% CI
Absolute absenteeism in past 7 days	−2.23	[−9.41, 4.95]	−4.72	[−13.4, 3.94]
Relative absenteeism in past 7 days	−0.13	[−0.35, 0.08]	−0.19	[−0.42, 0.04]
Absolute presenteeism in past 7 days c	10.62	[−0.53, 21.78]	15.42*	[0.87, 29.98]
Relative presenteeism in past 7 days d	0.11	[−0.06, 0.28]	0.16	[−0.04, 0.36]
	Unweighted, Adjusted e		Weighted, Adjusted b,e
	Reflexology vs. Control (ref)		Reflexology vs. vs. Control (ref)
	Coefficient	95% CI	Coefficient	95% CI
Absolute absenteeism in past 7 days	−8.63	[−18.7,1.42]	−9.19	[−22.3,3.91]
Relative absenteeism in past 7 days	−0.32*	[−0.60,−0.03]	−0.31	[−0.66,0.05]
Absolute presenteeism in past 7 days c	10.82	[−1.75,23.4]	13.93	[−0.90,28.77]
Relative presenteeism in past 7 days d	0.16	[−0.07,0.38]	0.19	[−0.01,0.40]

CI = confidence interval; ref = reference.

^*p < 0.05

^**p < 0.01

^***p < 0.001

^a.Ordinary least squares estimation of linear regression. N=58 for those employed at week 11.

^b.Inverse probability weighting with the probability for remaining in the study by week 11 estimated by logistic regression using baseline covariates in Table 1.

^c.Data missing for three patients

^d.Data missing for four patients

^e.Adjusted by baseline covariates in Table 1