Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Behav. 2019 Jul;23(7):1904–1916. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2371-3

Table 3.

Associations Between Demographic Controls and PrEP-Related Measures in a Sample of Men and Transgender Women and Men who Have Sex with Men

PrEP Use Model (HIV-negative men and transgender individuals who have sex with men, N = 357)
Knowledge Attitudes Stigma Des. Norms Sub. Norms Self-Efficacy Use

Age 0.15 (0.06)* −0.21 (0.13)+
Latino −0.46 (0.19)* −0.54 (0.20)** 0.83 (0.27)**
Black 0.38 (0.18)* 0.86 (0.25)***
Multiracial 0.47 (0.28)+
Transgender −0.48 (0.25)+
Monogamous 0.32 (0.12)* −0.50 (0.25)*
Unemployed −0.42 (0.20)* −0.52 (0.24)* 0.50 (0.20)* −0.37 (0.21)+ −0.57 (0.21)**
Income 0.09 (0.04)** −0.09 (0.04)*
Lives in a City −0.25 (0.14)+
Student −0.29 (0.15)*

PrEP Intentions Model (HIV-negative men and transgender individuals who have sex with men and are not currently taking PrEP, N = 310)

Knowledge Attitudes Stigma Des. Norms Sub. Norms Self-Efficacy Intentions

Age 0.17 (0.05)***
Latino −0.64 (0.18)*** −0.62 (0.19)*** 0.36 (0.14)**
Black 0.97 (0.18)***
Multiracial 0.49 (0.23)*
Transgender
Monogamous 0.27 (0.12)* −0.46 (0.13)*** −0.46 (0.13)***
Unemployed −0.47 (0.22)* −0.56 (0.25)* 0.41 (0.21)+ −0.37 (0.18)* −0.71 (0.25)**
Income −0.07 (0.03)*
Lives in a City 0.23 (0.13)+
Student

* p < .05

** p < .01

*** p < .001

+ p < .10

Notes. Unstandardized linear and probit regression coefficients (for continuous and categorical outcomes, respectively) and standard errors from final structural equation models are reported. Age was divided by 10 for analyses, such that an increase of 1 in age is equivalent to 10 years. Income was assessed on a 6-point scale. PrEP = Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Des. Norms = Descriptive Norms; Sub. Norms = Subjective Norms.