Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Addict Behav. 2019 May 3;96:68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.04.017

Table 1.

. Bivariate comparison of baseline characteristics for transgender individuals (N=286), comparing those with non-risky versus risky drinking at baseline.

Non-risky drinkers
(n=180)
Mean/SD or n(%)
Risky drinkers
(n=106)
Mean/SD or n(%)
t(df) or
X2(df)
P
Age 35.9 +/− 14.3 32.3 +/− 11.2 2.19 (284) 0.03
Sex assigned at birth 5.87 (1) 0.01
Female 82 (45.6) 64 (60.4)
Male 98 (54.4) 42 (39.6)
Race/Ethnicity 4.02 (1) NS
White, non-Hispanic 79 (43.9) 51 (48.1)
Hispanic/Latino 43 (23.9) 15 (14.2)
African American 22 (12.2) 16 (15.1)
Other 36 (20.0) 24 (22.6)
Educational attainment 0.66 (1) NS
High school or Less 34 (18.9) 16 (15.1)
Some college or more 146 (81.1) 90 (84.9)
Annual household income ≤2× 2016 US DHHS poverty guideline 76 (42.2) 48 (45.3) 0.03 (1) NS
Relationship status 0.29 (1) NS
Single 79 (43.9) 50 (47.2)
In a relationship 101 (56.1) 56 (52.8)
Enacted stigma 2.63 +/− 2.58 2.90 +/− 2.60 -0.85 (284) NS
Felt stigma 4.93 +/− 0.98 5.03 +/− 0.92 -0.85 (284) NS
Time since changing gender role/expression (years) 3.21 (2) NS
Milestone not met or <1 23 (12.8) 16 (15.1)
1–5 58 (32.2) 43 (40.6)
>5 99 (55.0) 47 (44.3)
Current gender-affirming psychotherapy 63 (35.0) 37 (34.9) 0 (1) NS
Current gender-affirming hormone therapy 124 (68.9) 72 (67.9) 0.03 (1) NS
Lifetime gender- affirming surgery 105 (58.3) 51 (48.1) 2.81 (1) NS
Transgender congruence score 4.95 +/− 1.23 4.98 +/− 1.11 -0.19 (283) NS
Social support 5.16 +/− 1.27 5.24 +/− 1.03 3.65 (284) NS

NS:Not significant