Table 3.

. Theory-driven, hierarchical multivariable logistic regression analyses among transgender individuals with risky drinking at baseline (N=106) to identify factors associated with improvement in risky drinking at 1-year follow-up.

	Model A (R² = 0.21)		Model B (R² = 0.25)		Model C (R² = 0.34)
	OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI	OR	95%CI
Age	1.00	0.96–1.05	1.01	0.96–1.06	1.03	0.97–1.09
Sex assigned at birth (ref male)	0.26	0.10–0.67	0.19	0.07–0.52	0.13	0.04–0.42
Race/Ethnicity (ref White, non-Hispanic)	2.82	1.03–7.71	3.94	1.30–11.94	4.31	1.25–14.90
Annual household income (ref. ≤2× 2016 US DHHS Poverty Guideline)	0.45	0.18–1.16	0.43	0.16–1.16	0.64	0.21–1.97
Study Site	-----	-----	-----	-----	-----	-----
Atlanta	2.90	0.76–11.14	3.07	0.75–12.62	2.40	0.46–12.40
New York City	4.50	1.33–15.24	4.18	1.15–15.20	3.23	0.74–14.01
San Francisco (ref)	-----	-----	-----	-----	-----	-----
Enacted stigma	-----	-----	0.83	0.67–1.03	0.75	0.58–0.96
Felt stigma	-----	-----	2.00	1.06–3.79	3.33	1.46–7.59
Time since changing gender role/expression (years)
Milestone not met or <1	-----	-----	-----	-----	2.06	0.41–10.46
1–5	-----	-----	-----	-----	5.45	1.46–20.38
>5 (ref)	-----	-----	-----	-----	-----	-----
Diffuse-avoidant identity style	-----	-----	-----	-----	3.97	1.48–10.64

Bold font: significant at p<0.05 level

Note: All independent variables refer to baseline measures except “diffuse-avoidant identity style,” which was only assessed at 1-year follow-up.